ChengDu Sports Univ, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Huaqiang Secondary, Renshou, 620500, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 21;14(1):24700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76150-1.
Purpose This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of cluster training versus traditional plyometric lower limb training on vertical and horizontal jump performance, as well as the reactive strength index, in young female artistic gymnasts.
A total of 54 female artistic gymnasts (15.4 ± 1.2 years) participated voluntarily this study. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: (i) cluster training (PLYct); (ii) traditional training (PLYtr); and (iii) a control group (not exposed to plyometric training). The intervention spanned 8 weeks, with evaluations conducted before and after the intervention period for the following variables: (i) squat jump; (ii) countermovement jump; and (iii) reactive strength index in a drop jump test.
Significant interactions time × group were found in SJ (p < 0.001; =0.505), CMJ (p<0.001; =0.241) and RSI (p < 0.001; =0.492). The time × group analysis in post-intervention revealed significantly greater performance in SJ of PLYct (3.0 cm; p < 0.001) and PLYtr (2.5 cm; p=0.001) in comparison to control group. Significantly higher CMJ height were observed for the PLYct group comparing to PLYtr (1.3 cm; p=0.008) and control (2.9 cm; <0.001), while PLYtr was significantly better than control (1.6 cm; p=0.001). PLYct had significantly greater RSI than PLYtr (0.07 RSI; p = 0.014) and control (0.10 RSI; p<0.001), while PLYtr was significantly better than control (0.10 RSI; p = 0.024).
Cluster sets were significantly more effective than traditional sets in improving the stretch-shortening cycle as measured by the CMJ and enhancing the reactive strength of gymnasts. It is recommended to incorporate cluster sets while applying plyometric training to maximize performance with favorable adaptations.
本随机对照研究旨在比较集群训练与传统下肢弹震式训练对年轻女子艺术体操运动员垂直和水平跳跃表现以及反应强度指数的影响。
共有 54 名女性艺术体操运动员(15.4±1.2 岁)自愿参加了这项研究。参与者被分为三组:(i)集群训练组(PLYct);(ii)传统训练组(PLYtr);和(iii)对照组(未接受弹震式训练)。干预时间为 8 周,在干预前后评估以下变量:(i)深蹲跳;(ii)反向跳;和(iii)跳深测试中的反应强度指数。
在 SJ(p<0.001;=0.505)、CMJ(p<0.001;=0.241)和 RSI(p<0.001;=0.492)中发现了显著的时间×组交互作用。干预后时间×组分析显示,PLYct(3.0cm;p<0.001)和 PLYtr(2.5cm;p=0.001)的 SJ 表现明显优于对照组。与 PLYtr(1.3cm;p=0.008)和对照组(2.9cm;<0.001)相比,PLYct 组的 CMJ 高度明显更高,而 PLYtr 明显优于对照组(1.6cm;p=0.001)。PLYct 的 RSI 明显高于 PLYtr(0.07 RSI;p=0.014)和对照组(0.10 RSI;p<0.001),而 PLYtr 明显优于对照组(0.10 RSI;p=0.024)。
集群组在改善 CMJ 所测量的伸缩周期和增强体操运动员的反应强度方面明显优于传统组。建议在应用弹震式训练时加入集群组,以最大限度地提高性能并实现有利的适应。