Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442107, India.
Department of Public Health, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442107, India.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1258. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05047-2.
Effective endodontic treatment requires the use of a root canal sealer with optimal properties to ensure a hermetic seal, prevent reinfection, and promote healing. Despite the availability of various sealers, a standardized evaluation system still needs to be improved.
To develop a Clinical Utility Index (CUI) that systematically evaluates and ranks root canal sealers based on their sealing ability, antimicrobial efficacy, flow rate, and solubility.
The CUI was developed through a structured process involving expert identification, panel discussions, and the establishment of scoring criteria. Five sealers were evaluated (Sealers A, B, C, D, and E). Mean values for the core properties were calculated, and sealers were ranked accordingly. The total CUI for each sealer was computed based on the assigned scores for each property.
Sealer B achieved the highest CUI at 95%, demonstrating superior performance across all core properties. Sealer C followed with a CUI of 80%, while Sealer A ranked third with 60%. Sealers D and E showed the lowest performance, with CUIs of 30% and 35%, respectively, highlighting deficiencies in multiple properties.
The CUI provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for root canal sealers, facilitating informed decision-making by practitioners. Sealer B's high CUI underscores the importance of balancing sealing ability, antimicrobial effect, flow rate, and solubility. The results align with existing literature emphasizing the critical role of these properties in endodontic success.
The CUI offers a robust and balanced method for evaluating root canal sealers, aiding in selecting the most suitable sealer based on empirical data. Future research should refine the index and validate its applicability in diverse clinical scenarios to enhance endodontic treatment outcomes.
有效的根管治疗需要使用具有最佳性能的根管封闭剂,以确保密封、防止再感染和促进愈合。尽管有各种不同的封闭剂,但仍需要改进标准化评估系统。
开发一种临床实用指数(CUI),以系统地评估和对根管封闭剂进行排名,评估依据是它们的密封能力、抗菌效果、流动率和溶解度。
CUI 通过一个结构化的过程开发,包括专家鉴定、小组讨论和评分标准的制定。对五种封闭剂(A、B、C、D 和 E 封剂)进行评估。计算核心性能的平均值,并据此对封闭剂进行排名。根据每个属性的分配分数,计算每个封闭剂的总 CUI。
B 封剂的 CUI 最高,为 95%,在所有核心性能方面表现卓越。紧随其后的是 C 封剂,CUI 为 80%,A 封剂排名第三,CUI 为 60%。D 封剂和 E 封剂表现最差,CUI 分别为 30%和 35%,这表明它们在多个性能方面存在缺陷。
CUI 为根管封闭剂提供了一个全面的评估框架,有助于临床医生做出明智的决策。B 封剂的高 CUI 强调了平衡密封能力、抗菌效果、流动率和溶解度的重要性。结果与强调这些特性在根管治疗成功中的关键作用的现有文献一致。
CUI 为评估根管封闭剂提供了一种稳健而平衡的方法,有助于根据经验数据选择最合适的封闭剂。未来的研究应进一步完善该指数,并验证其在不同临床情况下的适用性,以提高根管治疗的效果。