• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“参与对话”:来自一个由急诊医学领导层组成的多元化、公平与包容读书俱乐部的质性反思

"Showing up to the conversation": Qualitative reflections from a diversity, equity, and inclusion book club with emergency medicine leadership.

作者信息

Alexander Andreia B, Palmer Megan, Palmer Dajanae, Pettit Katie

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Feb;32(2):137-146. doi: 10.1111/acem.15034. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1111/acem.15034
PMID:39434515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11816006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in health care fosters many positive outcomes including improved patient care. DEI initiatives are often created by or require buy-in from departmental leaders with low DEI literacy. Book clubs are one way to develop DEI literacy. The purpose of this paper is to describe how leaders in the department of emergency medicine (DEM) process the information gained from reading a DEI book through discussion in a book club setting and explore how participation enhances their DEI literacy and fosters self-reflection.

METHODS

This was a qualitative exploratory study based on a constructivist approach. Data were analyzed by four researchers using inductive thematic analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight leaders within the DEM participated in 11 book clubs. Nine themes were identified (examination of privilege, initial reaction to discussion about racism, discomfort, worry, self-reflection, release, role recognition, readiness, and education). After prompted examination of their own privilege participants moved through a model of perceived readiness to act. Participants started with feeling paralyzed by the work's enormity or becoming defensive. They then moved toward discomfort with discussions of racism and systemic racism and progressed to discussions around worrying that they were contributing to noninclusive environments. After a period of self-reflection, participants tended to release their paralysis, push aside their defensiveness, accept the role of discomfort, and express the importance of education on these issues. Participants then recognized their role in creating inclusive environments and started discussing what they can do about it, which, for many, was to show up to the conversation. An underlying driver of movement through this model was the education that was provided through the book.

CONCLUSIONS

By addressing privilege and systemic inequities through the reflective practice and dialogue of a book club, participants demonstrated a growing commitment and perceived readiness to advancing inclusive practices within medicine.

摘要

背景

医疗保健领域的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)能带来诸多积极成果,包括改善患者护理。DEI倡议通常由DEI素养较低的部门领导发起或需要他们的支持。读书俱乐部是培养DEI素养的一种方式。本文旨在描述急诊医学部(DEM)的领导如何通过读书俱乐部的讨论来处理从阅读一本关于DEI的书中获得的信息,并探讨参与如何提高他们的DEI素养并促进自我反思。

方法

这是一项基于建构主义方法的定性探索性研究。四名研究人员使用归纳主题分析技术对数据进行了分析。

结果

DEM的68名领导参加了11个读书俱乐部。确定了九个主题(审视特权、对种族主义讨论的初步反应、不适、担忧、自我反思、释怀、角色认同、准备就绪和教育)。在促使参与者审视自己的特权后,他们经历了一个感知到的行动准备模型。参与者一开始因工作的艰巨性而感到瘫痪或变得防御性。然后,他们对种族主义和系统性种族主义的讨论感到不适,并进而讨论担心自己在营造不包容环境方面起到了作用。经过一段时间的自我反思,参与者倾向于解除瘫痪状态,抛开防御心理,接受不适的角色,并表达在这些问题上进行教育的重要性。参与者随后认识到自己在创造包容环境中的角色,并开始讨论他们能为此做些什么,对许多人来说,就是参与到对话中来。通过这个模型的潜在驱动因素是通过书籍提供的教育。

结论

通过读书俱乐部的反思性实践和对话来解决特权和系统性不平等问题,参与者表现出越来越坚定的承诺,并感知到在医学领域推进包容实践的准备就绪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9789/11816006/24301ae29a67/ACEM-32-137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9789/11816006/24301ae29a67/ACEM-32-137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9789/11816006/24301ae29a67/ACEM-32-137-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
"Showing up to the conversation": Qualitative reflections from a diversity, equity, and inclusion book club with emergency medicine leadership.“参与对话”:来自一个由急诊医学领导层组成的多元化、公平与包容读书俱乐部的质性反思
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Feb;32(2):137-146. doi: 10.1111/acem.15034. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Experiences of Leaders in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Academic Health Centers.美国学术健康中心在多元化、公平与包容方面领导者的经验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15401.
3
The Current State of Departmental Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts Within US Academic Radiation Oncology Departments.美国学术放射肿瘤学系部门多样性、公平性和包容性工作的现状。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jun 1;116(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.071. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Pharmacist preceptor perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion in experiential learning experiences.药剂师带教老师对体验式学习经历中的多样性、公平性和包容性的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025 Apr;17(4):102219. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102219. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
5
A Novel Narrative Medicine Approach to DEI Training for Medical School Faculty.一种针对医学院教师的多元化、公平与包容(DEI)培训的新型叙事医学方法。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Aug-Sep;35(4):457-466. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2067165. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Changes in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Activities of Family Medicine Departments.家庭医学科在多样性、公平性和包容性方面活动的变化
Fam Med. 2025 Jan;57(1):20-27. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.917355. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
7
Executive summary of the SAEM 2022 consensus conference to address racism in emergency medicine clinical research, training, and leadership.SAEM 2022 年共识会议执行摘要,旨在解决急诊医学临床研究、培训和领导中的种族主义问题。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;30(7):765-772. doi: 10.1111/acem.14727. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
Navigating Nonlinear Pathways: Challenges and Opportunities for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Leaders in Academic Emergency Medicine.探索非线性路径:学术急诊医学中多元化、公平性与包容性领导者面临的挑战与机遇
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Feb 14;6(2):100060. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100060. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Decoloniality and healthcare higher education: Critical conversations.去殖民化与高等医疗教育:批判性对话。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12982. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
10
The non-White standard: Racial bias in perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion leaders.非白人标准:对多样性、公平性和包容性领导者的看法中的种族偏见。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Jul;109(7):971-986. doi: 10.1037/apl0001106. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Doing the Work-or Not: The Promise and Limitations of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Medical Schools and Academic Medical Centers.开展工作与否:多样性、公平性和包容性在美国医学院校和学术医疗中心的承诺和局限。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;10:900283. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900283. eCollection 2022.
2
Building Inclusive Work Environments.营造包容的工作环境。
Pediatrics. 2021 Sep 1;148(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051440E.
3
A Virtual Book Club for Professional Development in Emergency Medicine.虚拟读书俱乐部在急诊医学专业发展中的应用。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 14;22(1):108-114. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.11.49066.
4
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Medicine: Why It Matters and How do We Achieve It?医学中的多样性、公平性和包容性:为什么它很重要以及我们如何实现它?
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Self-care perspective taking and empathy in a studentfaculty book club in the United States.美国学生-教师读书俱乐部中的自我关怀换位思考和同理心。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.22. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
6
Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action.马丁·路德·金或马尔科姆·X,谁是更能被接受的抗议者形象?高地位群体对低地位群体集体行动的反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):919-944. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000195. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
The 2017 ACGME Common Work Hour Standards: Promoting Physician Learning and Professional Development in a Safe, Humane Environment.2017年美国研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)工作时长通用标准:在安全、人道的环境中促进医师学习与职业发展
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):692-696. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00317.1.
8
Reading books and reading patients: can Book Clubs help both?阅读书籍与研读病人:读书俱乐部能对两者都有所助益吗?
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2016 Dec;46(4):260-262. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2016.412.
9
It Takes an Academic Village: The Library's Role in Supporting Interprofessional Communication through a Book Club.众人拾柴火焰高:图书馆通过读书俱乐部在支持跨专业交流方面的作用。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):42-48. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259903.
10
Race talk: the psychology of racial dialogues.种族对话:种族对话的心理学。
Am Psychol. 2013 Nov;68(8):663-72. doi: 10.1037/a0033681.