Suppr超能文献

可观察期对医疗保险受益的肺癌患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断时间分类的影响

Impact of observability period on the classification of COPD diagnosis timing among Medicare beneficiaries with lung cancer.

作者信息

Metwally Eman, Soppe Sarah E, Lund Jennifer L, Hinton Sharon Peacock, Thompson Caroline A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 22;3(10):e0000633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000633. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Investigators often use claims data to estimate the diagnosis timing of chronic conditions. However, misclassification of chronic conditions is common due to variability in healthcare utilization and in claims history across patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to quantify the effect of various Medicare fee-for-service continuous enrollment period and lookback period (LBP) on misclassification of COPD and sample size.

METHODS

A stepwise tutorial to classify COPD, based on its diagnosis timing relative to lung cancer diagnosis using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry linked to Medicare insurance claims. We used 3 approaches varying the LBP and required continuous enrollment (i.e., observability) period between 1 to 5 years. Patients with lung cancer were classified based on their COPD related healthcare utilization into 3 groups: pre-existing COPD (diagnosis at least 3 months before lung cancer diagnosis), concurrent COPD (diagnosis during the -/+ 3months of lung cancer diagnosis), and non-COPD. Among those with 5 years of continuous enrollment, we estimated the sensitivity of the LBP to ascertain COPD diagnosis as the number of patients with pre-existing COPD using a shorter LBP divided by the number of patients with pre-existing COPD using a longer LBP.

RESULTS

Extending the LBP from 1 to 5 years increased prevalence of pre-existing COPD from ~ 36% to 51%, decreased both concurrent COPD from ~ 34% to 23% and non-COPD from ~ 29% to 25%. There was minimal effect of extending the required continuous enrollment period beyond one year across various LBPs. In those with 5 years of continuous enrollment, sensitivity of COPD classification (95% CI) increased with longer LBP from 70.1% (69.7% to 70.4%) for one-year LBP to 100% for 5-years LBP.

CONCLUSION

The length of optimum LBP and continuous enrollment period depends on the context of the research question and the data generating mechanisms. Among Medicare beneficiaries, the best approach to identify diagnosis timing of COPD relative to lung cancer diagnosis is to use all available LBP with at least one year of required continuous enrollment.

摘要

背景

研究人员经常使用索赔数据来估计慢性病的诊断时间。然而,由于患者医疗服务利用情况和索赔历史的差异,慢性病的错误分类很常见。

目的

我们旨在量化各种医疗保险按服务收费的连续参保期和回顾期(LBP)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)错误分类和样本量的影响。

方法

基于与医疗保险索赔相关的监测、流行病学和最终结果癌症登记处,根据COPD相对于肺癌诊断的诊断时间,制定了一个逐步分类COPD的教程。我们使用了3种方法,改变LBP并要求连续参保(即可观察性)期为1至5年。肺癌患者根据其与COPD相关的医疗服务利用情况分为3组:既往存在的COPD(肺癌诊断前至少3个月诊断)、并发COPD(肺癌诊断的±3个月内诊断)和非COPD。在连续参保5年的患者中,我们将LBP确定COPD诊断的敏感性估计为使用较短LBP的既往存在COPD患者数量除以使用较长LBP的既往存在COPD患者数量。

结果

将LBP从1年延长至5年,既往存在的COPD患病率从约36%增至51%,并发COPD从约34%降至23%,非COPD从约29%降至25%。在各种LBP下,将所需连续参保期延长至1年以上的影响极小。在连续参保5年的患者中,COPD分类的敏感性(95%CI)随着LBP延长而增加,从1年LBP时的70.1%(69.7%至70.4%)增至5年LBP时的100%。

结论

最佳LBP和连续参保期的长度取决于研究问题的背景和数据生成机制。在医疗保险受益人中,确定COPD相对于肺癌诊断的诊断时间的最佳方法是使用所有可用的LBP,并要求至少连续参保1年。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验