Suppr超能文献

验证一种生物心理社会困扰筛查工具 SupportScreen 在巴西癌症中心的适用性。

Validation of a Biopsychosocial Distress Screening Tool, SupportScreen, in a Brazilian Cancer Center.

机构信息

Oncoclinicas & Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70001. doi: 10.1002/pon.70001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biopsychosocial distress is a common yet often underestimated complication in cancer care. We sought to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of SupportScreen distress assessment tool in Brazil.

METHODS

A cancer cohort study was conducted at a public hospital in Brazil. The SupportScreen tool underwent transcultural translation into Portuguese. Eligible patients completed the SupportScreen, Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version (FACT-G). Statistical analyses included confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA), comparisons with established distress tools, and assessments of associations with patients' characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients were assessed (M:F 35.4%:64.6%; median age: 55). Most patients were diagnosed with breast (29.1%) and gastrointestinal cancer (20.5%), at advanced disease stage (78.8%). CFA identified optimal models for emotional and physical distress; EFA revealed two factors for the logistics of medical care: practical and medical system distress. The concurrent validity of subscales demonstrated significant correlations between distress domains. Sensitivity analyses indicated good performance of emotional and physical domains in identifying distress compared to gold standard criteria. Female patients were more likely to report high emotional distress, while younger age and late disease stage were associated with higher physical distress. Additionally, late disease stage was linked to higher practical distress.

CONCLUSION

Emotional and physical domains demonstrated validity and reliability, aligning with validated measures. Logistics of medical care distress revealed practical and medical system dimensions, expanding understanding of patient challenges. The SupportScreen tool exhibited concurrent validity and sensitivity in identifying distress.

摘要

目的

生物心理社会困扰是癌症治疗中常见但常被低估的并发症。我们试图翻译并评估 SupportScreen 困扰评估工具在巴西的心理测量学特性。

方法

在巴西的一家公立医院进行了一项癌症队列研究。SupportScreen 工具经历了跨文化翻译成葡萄牙语。符合条件的患者完成了 SupportScreen、困扰温度计(DT)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)以及癌症治疗功能评估一般版本(FACT-G)。统计分析包括验证性和探索性因素分析(CFA 和 EFA)、与既定困扰工具的比较以及评估与患者特征的关联。

结果

共评估了 302 名患者(M:F 35.4%:64.6%;中位数年龄:55 岁)。大多数患者被诊断为乳腺癌(29.1%)和胃肠道癌(20.5%),处于晚期疾病阶段(78.8%)。CFA 确定了情绪和身体困扰的最佳模型;EFA 揭示了医疗保健后勤的两个因素:实际和医疗系统困扰。亚量表的同时效度表明,在识别困扰方面,不同领域之间存在显著相关性。敏感性分析表明,与黄金标准标准相比,情绪和身体领域在识别困扰方面表现良好。女性患者更有可能报告情绪困扰较高,而年龄较小和疾病晚期与身体困扰较高相关。此外,晚期疾病阶段与较高的实际困扰有关。

结论

情绪和身体领域表现出有效性和可靠性,与经过验证的测量标准一致。医疗保健后勤的困扰揭示了实际和医疗系统的维度,扩展了对患者挑战的理解。SupportScreen 工具在识别困扰方面具有同时效度和敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验