Allegaert Karel, van den Anker John
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Nov 15;20(4):1294-1306. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.100715. eCollection 2024.
There are epidemiological - not necessary causal - observations that link perinatal paracetamol (acetaminophen) exposure to impaired neuro-cognition and behaviour, but animal models may assist to better understand the mechanisms.
To provide an overview on preclinical data and mechanisms explored, we conducted a structured literature search on animal models and neuro-cognition and behavioural outcome following perinatal paracetamol exposure.
This search resulted in 20 papers (rat ( = 9), zebrafish larvae ( = 6), mice ( = 5)), published between 2009 and 2020. Eight discussed pregnancy/fetal paracetamol exposure, 6 juvenile, 6 studies combined pregnancy and juvenile exposure. Quality assessment (SYRCLE's bias risk) showed a heterogeneous pattern with blinding issues. Most papers ( = 16) described paracetamol exposure without indication, except for an induced fever and repetitive needle pricking (rat), brain injury (mice), and a zebrafish nociception model. Reported outcomes related to biochemistry (mono-amines, amino acids, protein expression), anatomy (teratogen, morphology, nuclear size) or behaviour (spatial memory, motor, social behaviour and exploration, sexual behaviour). On mechanisms, the cumulative data support an interesting 'cannabinoid' hypothesis to link paracetamol to neuro-cognitive and behavioural outcome. Besides limited species diversity, there is relevant within-species paracetamol dosing variability (dose, duration) with undocumented exposure.
Models should further integrate clinical indications, as non-exposure is the obvious safest setting in the absence of an indication. Besides pain and fever and related to the cannabinoid hypothesis, this should include perinatal brain injury, as there is animal experimental evidence that cannabinoids are neuroprotective in newborn brain injury or asphyxia, further supported by evidence from non-perinatal models of paracetamol-related neuroprotective effects.
有流行病学观察(不一定是因果关系)表明围产期对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)暴露与神经认知和行为受损有关,但动物模型可能有助于更好地理解其机制。
为了概述临床前数据及所探究的机制,我们对围产期对乙酰氨基酚暴露后的动物模型、神经认知和行为结果进行了结构化文献检索。
该检索得到20篇论文(大鼠(9篇)、斑马鱼幼体(6篇)、小鼠(5篇)),发表于2009年至2020年之间。8篇讨论了孕期/胎儿期对乙酰氨基酚暴露,6篇讨论幼年期暴露,6项研究结合了孕期和幼年期暴露。质量评估(SYRCLE偏倚风险)显示存在因盲法问题导致的异质性模式。除了诱导发热和重复针刺(大鼠)、脑损伤(小鼠)以及斑马鱼伤害感受模型外,大多数论文(16篇)描述对乙酰氨基酚暴露时未提及指征。报告的结果涉及生物化学(单胺类、氨基酸、蛋白质表达)、解剖学(致畸原、形态学、核大小)或行为(空间记忆、运动、社交行为与探索、性行为)。在机制方面,累积数据支持一个有趣的“大麻素”假说,该假说将对乙酰氨基酚与神经认知和行为结果联系起来。除了物种多样性有限外,存在物种内对乙酰氨基酚给药的变异性(剂量、持续时间)且暴露情况未记录。
模型应进一步整合临床指征,因为在无指征的情况下不暴露显然是最安全的情况。除了疼痛、发热以及与大麻素假说相关的情况外,这还应包括围产期脑损伤,因为有动物实验证据表明大麻素在新生儿脑损伤或窒息中具有神经保护作用,非围产期对乙酰氨基酚相关神经保护作用模型的证据进一步支持了这一点。