Scallon Kylie, Wiggins Shirley, Samson Kaeli K, Shah Adil
Trauma, Children's Nebraska, Omaha, USA.
Education, Children's Nebraska, Omaha, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e72044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72044. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Background Child abuse is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children. A thorough history and physical exam is critical to identifying abuse. Standardized screening tools as well as clinical pathways can assist with identifying patients who may have an injury secondary to abuse. There are varied recommendations for the upper age in which to routinely evaluate pediatric patients for child abuse. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of the implementation of an evidence-based clinical pathway for suspected non-accidental trauma for all pediatric patients aged five years and under presenting with a femur fracture. This pathway includes orders for imaging, labs, and consults. In addition, the characteristics of this population and the findings were described. Methods A retrospective study of patients at a single institution who met the National Trauma Data Standard registry inclusion criteria and had a femur fracture was performed. Variables analyzed included age, demographics, mechanism and location of injury, admission status and service, injury severity, hospital characteristics, and discharge status. Patients with a metabolic bone disease were excluded. Results There were 200 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two patients had a diagnosis of confirmed or suspected child abuse. While all 32 patients had a skeletal survey performed, only 23 (71.9%) had the complete workup per the clinical pathway, and 21 (65.6%) had a diagnosis of confirmed child abuse. Conclusion Clinical pathways are established to provide the standardization of clinical assessments and interventions; however, this process relies on a single individual to make a judgment determining whether or not to implement the pathway. Children presenting to an emergency department with confirmed or suspected child abuse are a vulnerable population. A child abuse diagnosis is a clinical judgment; however, clinical pathways aid in the diagnosis in hopes to stop any further abuse. For a pathway to be successful, each step needs to be addressed.
儿童虐待是儿童发病和死亡的重要原因。全面的病史和体格检查对于识别虐待至关重要。标准化筛查工具以及临床路径有助于识别可能因虐待而受伤的患者。对于常规评估儿科患者是否遭受儿童虐待的上限年龄,存在不同的建议。
本研究的主要目的是描述对所有5岁及以下因股骨骨折就诊的疑似非意外创伤儿科患者实施循证临床路径的结果。该路径包括影像学检查、实验室检查和会诊医嘱。此外,还描述了该人群的特征和检查结果。
对一家符合国家创伤数据标准登记纳入标准且有股骨骨折的单一机构的患者进行回顾性研究。分析的变量包括年龄、人口统计学、损伤机制和部位、入院状态和科室、损伤严重程度、医院特征以及出院状态。排除患有代谢性骨病的患者。
有200名患者符合纳入标准。32名患者被诊断为确诊或疑似儿童虐待。虽然所有32名患者都进行了骨骼检查,但根据临床路径,只有23名(71.9%)患者进行了完整的检查,21名(65.6%)患者被诊断为确诊儿童虐待。
建立临床路径是为了实现临床评估和干预的标准化;然而,这一过程依赖于个体来判断是否实施该路径。因确诊或疑似儿童虐待而到急诊科就诊的儿童是弱势群体。儿童虐待诊断是一种临床判断;然而,临床路径有助于诊断,以期阻止任何进一步的虐待行为。要使路径成功,每一步都需要得到落实。