• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医院的磁石地位与政策及实践中对 LGBTQ+ 的包容性之间的关系。

The Relationship Between a Hospital's Magnet Status and LGBTQ+ Inclusivity in Policies and Practices in US Hospitals.

作者信息

Yu Hyunmin, Bonett Stephen, Flores Dalmacio Dennis, Meanley Steven, Choi Seul Ki, Hanneman Tari, Bauermeister José A

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2025 Feb;48(1):30-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.22422. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1002/nur.22422
PMID:39440463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11707491/
Abstract

LGBTQ+ individuals face discrimination in healthcare settings. Magnet hospitals have been associated with positive patient outcomes, yet it remains uncertain whether Magnet designation is associated with hospitals' LGBTQ+ inclusivity in policies and practices. This study examined 801 American hospitals across 47 states that participated in the Healthcare Equality Index (HEI) in 2021. Multilevel modeling was utilized to investigate the association between Magnet status and HEI scores, adjusting for hospital type and state-level covariates, including LGBTQ+ inclusiveness in laws, political climate, racial/ethnic minority population, and Medicaid expansion status. Among the 801 hospitals, 32.1% (257 hospitals) held Magnet status. Magnet hospitals demonstrated higher HEI scores compared to non-Magnet hospitals (γ = 2.13, p = 0.022), despite significant variations across states (intraclass correlation = 0.22). No significant cross-level interactions were found. Overall, Magnet designation is independently associated with improved LGBTQ+ inclusivity in hospitals regardless of the state in which the hospital is located. Policymakers and healthcare leaders should consider leveraging the Magnet Recognition Program as a benchmark for promoting LGBTQ+ inclusivity within hospitals. Additionally, all healthcare institutions should prioritize comprehensive evaluations and improvements to their policies and practices to ensure inclusivity for LGBTQ+ patients.

摘要

LGBTQ+群体在医疗环境中面临歧视。磁石医院与良好的患者治疗效果相关联,但磁石认证是否与医院在政策和实践中对LGBTQ+群体的包容性相关仍不确定。本研究调查了2021年参与医疗平等指数(HEI)的47个州的801家美国医院。采用多层次建模来研究磁石状态与HEI分数之间的关联,并对医院类型和州级协变量进行了调整,这些协变量包括法律中的LGBTQ+包容性、政治氛围、种族/族裔少数群体人口以及医疗补助扩展状况。在这801家医院中,32.1%(257家医院)具有磁石状态。尽管各州之间存在显著差异(组内相关系数=0.22),但磁石医院的HEI分数高于非磁石医院(γ=2.13,p=0.022)。未发现显著的跨层次交互作用。总体而言,无论医院位于哪个州,磁石认证都与医院改善对LGBTQ+群体的包容性独立相关。政策制定者和医疗保健领导者应考虑将磁石认可计划作为促进医院内LGBTQ+群体包容性的基准。此外,所有医疗机构都应优先对其政策和实践进行全面评估和改进,以确保为LGBTQ+患者提供包容性服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f6/11707491/322f3c40b0f3/NUR-48-30-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f6/11707491/c375cca66e96/NUR-48-30-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f6/11707491/322f3c40b0f3/NUR-48-30-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f6/11707491/c375cca66e96/NUR-48-30-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f6/11707491/322f3c40b0f3/NUR-48-30-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between a Hospital's Magnet Status and LGBTQ+ Inclusivity in Policies and Practices in US Hospitals.美国医院的磁石地位与政策及实践中对 LGBTQ+ 的包容性之间的关系。
Res Nurs Health. 2025 Feb;48(1):30-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.22422. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
LGBTQ+ Inclusive Policies, Nurse Job Outcomes, and Quality of Care in Hospitals.医院中包含LGBTQ+群体的政策、护士工作成果及护理质量
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1765.
3
Demonstrating Nursing Excellence Through Equality: The Relationship Between Magnet® Status and Organizational LGBTQ Client Services and Support.通过平等展现护理卓越:磁石®地位与组织 LGBTQ 客户服务和支持之间的关系。
J Transcult Nurs. 2020 Mar;31(2):209-215. doi: 10.1177/1043659619865585. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
The Relationship Between "Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality" Designation and Hospitals' Patient Experience Scores.LGBT 医疗保健平等领域的领导者称号与医院患者体验评分之间的关系。
J Healthc Manag. 2020 Sep-Oct;65(5):366-377. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-19-00177.
5
Nurse leaders' recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study.护士领导者关于在卫生系统中实施包容 LGBTQ+ 群体做法的建议:一项定性描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Oct 31;7:100262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100262. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Do Hospitals Achieving "Leader in LGBTQ Healthcare Equality" Maintain Higher Patient Scores Compared To Nonleaders?医院在 LGBTQ 医疗保健平等方面达到“领先地位”,与非领先医院相比,患者评分是否更高?
J Healthc Qual. 2022;44(5):269-275. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000351.
7
A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Hospital Participation in the Healthcare Equality Index.影响医院参与医疗平等指数的因素的定性研究
J Healthc Qual. 2024;46(3):177-187. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000426. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Orthopaedic Care of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: A Survey of Two Pediatric Academic Hospitals.知识、态度和实践:小儿矫形护理中的性与性别少数青年——两所儿科医院的调查。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1313-1328. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002143. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.美国的歧视:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿美国人的经历。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1454-1466. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13229. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Sexual Orientation- and Gender Identity-Affirming Activities Provided in Primary Care.初级保健中提供的性取向和性别认同确认活动。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250392. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0392.

引用本文的文献

1
LGBTQ+ Inclusive Policies, Nurse Job Outcomes, and Quality of Care in Hospitals.医院中包含LGBTQ+群体的政策、护士工作成果及护理质量
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1765.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Magnet ® Recognition and Patient Outcomes : A Scoping Review.《Magnet ® 认可与患者结局的关联:范围综述》。
J Nurs Adm. 2023 Oct 1;53(10):500-507. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001325. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Concept Analysis: LGBT+ Inclusive Health Care.概念分析:LGBT+ 包容的医疗保健。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2023;46(4):410-423. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000467. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Down but not defeated: Clinicians can harness the power of policy for LGBTQ+ rights.虽败犹荣:临床医生可以利用政策的力量来争取 LGBTQ+ 群体的权利。
Prev Med. 2023 Feb;167:107423. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107423. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Responding to "Don't Say Gay" Laws in the US: Research Priorities and Considerations for Health Equity.应对美国的“不要说同性恋”法案:健康公平的研究重点与考量
Sex Res Social Policy. 2022;19(4):1397-1402. doi: 10.1007/s13178-022-00773-0. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Effects of Opioid Prescribing Cap Laws on Opioid and Other Pain Treatments Among Persons with Chronic Pain.阿片类药物处方限制法对慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物和其他疼痛治疗的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):929-937. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07796-8. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
State prescribing cap laws' association with opioid analgesic prescribing and opioid overdose.州处方配药量上限法与阿片类镇痛药处方和阿片类药物过量的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Nov 1;240:109626. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109626. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
7
Association Between State Opioid Prescribing Cap Laws and Receipt of Opioid Prescriptions Among Children and Adolescents.州级阿片类药物处方配给法规与儿童和青少年获得阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222461. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2461. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Health Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Service Members and Veterans.同性恋、双性恋军人和退伍军人的健康差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.034. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
9
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the 2023 Magnet® Application Manual.2023 年 Magnet®应用手册中的多样性、公平性和包容性。
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Jun 1;52(6):322-323. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001154.
10
Statistical implications of endogeneity induced by residential segregation in small-area modelling of health inequities.居住隔离在健康不平等小区域建模中引发的内生性的统计影响。
Am Stat. 2022;76(2):142-151. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2021.2003245. Epub 2022 Jan 4.