University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Columbia University, United States.
Disasters. 2025 Jan;49(1):e12658. doi: 10.1111/disa.12658. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Skyrocketing commodity prices and conflict-induced mass hunger in recent years have resuscitated discussions about why famines frequently reoccur in specific spaces of vulnerability. Intervention efforts still too often isolate food (in)security from its interwovenness in the political economy of water and energy and from the role of ideas in forging these interconnections across long time periods. Using (South) Sudanese history to rethink the causes of recurrent food insecurity, we underscore the need to analyse how political elites imagine the role of the water-energy-food nexus and associated environmental narratives in consolidating power. South Sudan's 2011 secession (from Sudan) marked the culmination of a struggle against a state that insurgents regarded as having starved its citizens. However, since independence, its leaders have replicated the nostrum they once combatted: Sudanese resources must 'feed the world'. A fixation with inserting water, energy, and food resources into global markets infuses their strategy, even if such an approach will not engender food abundance.
近年来,不断飙升的大宗商品价格和冲突导致的大规模饥饿,再次引发了人们的讨论,即为何饥荒经常在特定的脆弱地区反复发生。干预措施仍然过于频繁地将粮食(不安全)与其在水和能源政治经济中的交织以及观念在长期内塑造这些联系的作用隔离开来。我们以南苏丹的历史为例,重新思考导致粮食不安全反复出现的原因,强调需要分析政治精英如何想象水、能源和粮食关系及其相关环境叙事在巩固权力方面的作用。2011 年,南苏丹(从苏丹)独立,这标志着对一个被叛乱分子视为使其公民挨饿的国家的斗争达到了高潮。然而,自独立以来,其领导人一直在重复他们曾经反对的口号:苏丹的资源必须“养活世界”。将水、能源和粮食资源注入全球市场的执着,融入了他们的战略,即使这种方法不会带来粮食丰裕。