Department of Anthropology, University of Khartoum, Sudan.
SOAS Food Studies Centre, University of London, United Kingdom.
Disasters. 2025 Jan;49(1):e12663. doi: 10.1111/disa.12663. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
This article explores the role of historical, political, and economic processes in understanding war and famine in Sudan after 2023. The focus is on Al-Gezira, the site of Sudan's largest agricultural scheme. Using ethnography, interviews, and document reviews, the study analyses the Gezira irrigation project in three phases. First, the 1980s and 1990s, when patronage politics dominated its management. Second, the neoliberal strategies of the Gezira Scheme Act of 2005, which enabled Islamist profiteering while increasing vulnerability among farmers and labourers and tensions between them. Third, post 2018, when political movements used evidence of the scheme's deterioration to call for revolution, but once achieved, previous tensions grew and have been manipulated during the war. Sudan provides an example of how decades of war and neoliberal economic strategies have led to a deeply-rooted, violent, and extractive political economy. This has been to the benefit of business and elites, leaving many to a life of precarity, exploitation, and hunger.
本文探讨了历史、政治和经济进程在理解 2023 年后苏丹战争和饥荒中的作用。重点关注的是苏丹最大农业计划的所在地——杰济拉。本研究采用民族志、访谈和文件审查,分三个阶段分析了杰济拉灌溉项目。首先是 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代,当时庇护政治主导了其管理。其次是 2005 年《杰济拉计划法案》的新自由主义战略,该战略使伊斯兰主义者得以牟取暴利,同时增加了农民和工人之间的脆弱性和紧张关系。第三,2018 年后,政治运动利用该计划恶化的证据呼吁革命,但一旦实现,之前的紧张局势加剧,并在战争期间被操纵。苏丹提供了一个例子,说明几十年的战争和新自由主义经济战略如何导致了根深蒂固的、暴力的和剥削性的政治经济。这对企业和精英有利,使许多人陷入不稳定、剥削和饥饿的生活。