Suzuki Hiroyuki, Pandya Abhishek, Hasegawa Shinya, Tholany Joseph
Center for Access & Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Infection. 2025 Apr;53(2):607-614. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Although guidelines recommend adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), evidence behind the recommendation is limited and conflicting.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with staphylococcal PVE within the Veterans Health Administration during 2003-2021. Patients were identified with diagnostic codes for prosthetic valves and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species and confirmed via manual chart reviews. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or recurrence of staphylococcal PVE within one year from diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the probability of individuals receiving rifampin using propensity scores. IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between patients who received rifampin and gentamicin, and those did not.
Among 373 patients with staphylococcal PVE, 275 (73.7%) and 225 (60.3%) received at least one dose of rifampin and gentamicin, respectively. The incidence of staphylococcal PVE increased from 0.47 (2003-11) to 0.77 (2012-21) per 10,000 hospitalizations. Gentamicin use declined over time (70.1% in 2003-2011 to 54.8% in 2012-2021, p = 0.04) while rifampin use did not change significantly (76.1% in 2003-2011 to 72.4% in 2012-2021, p = 0.43). The composite outcome was observed in 209 (56.0%). Neither rifampin use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.24) and gentamicin use (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74) was associated with the composite outcome.
No significant association was observed between adjunctive rifampin or gentamicin use and improved outcomes.
尽管指南推荐对葡萄球菌人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)患者联合使用利福平与庆大霉素,但该推荐背后的证据有限且存在冲突。
我们对2003年至2021年退伍军人健康管理局内所有葡萄球菌性PVE患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。通过人工瓣膜的诊断编码以及葡萄球菌属血培养阳性来识别患者,并通过人工查阅病历进行确认。主要结局是诊断后一年内全因死亡率或葡萄球菌性PVE复发的复合结局。采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW),利用倾向评分估计个体接受利福平治疗的概率。采用IPTW调整的多变量Cox回归分析比较接受利福平和庆大霉素治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者之间的结局。
在373例葡萄球菌性PVE患者中,分别有275例(73.7%)和225例(60.3%)接受了至少一剂利福平和庆大霉素治疗。葡萄球菌性PVE的发病率从每10000次住院0.47例(2003 - 2011年)增至0.77例(2012 - 2021年)。庆大霉素的使用随时间下降(2003 - 2011年为70.1%,2012 - 2021年为54.8%,p = 0.04),而利福平的使用无显著变化(2003 - 2011年为76.1%,2012 - 2021年为72.4%,p = 0.43)。209例(56.0%)患者出现了复合结局。利福平使用(调整后风险比[HR] 0.77,95%置信区间0.48 - 1.24)和庆大霉素使用(调整后HR 1.11,95%置信区间0.71 - 1.74)均与复合结局无关。
未观察到联合使用利福平或庆大霉素与改善结局之间存在显著关联。