• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对信息请求的非句子性回应。

Non-sentential responses to requests for information.

作者信息

Brousse Catherine M, Chia Katherine, Kaschak Michael P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1207-1225. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01645-1. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01645-1
PMID:39441493
Abstract

When faced with requests for information ("Where did you go last night?"), why do speakers make non-sentential replies ("The movies") rather than full sentence replies ("I went to the movies")? We examine the role that pragmatic factors (politeness and formality) and memory factors (the speaker's ability to retrieve the answer to the question) play in determining whether speakers generate a non-sentential reply. Participants answered a series of questions about their lives. Pragmatic factors affected the participants' responses. Speakers instructed to be polite or formal made fewer non-sentential replies than speakers who did not receive specific instructions. Memory retrieval (indexed both by the time required for the participant to begin their response and by the presence of disfluencies at the beginning of the response) did not have a straightforward relationship to the production of non-sentential replies. The effect of response latency and disfluencies depended on whether the participants were told to be polite or formal (or if they were given no instruction at all).

摘要

当面对信息询问(“你昨晚去哪儿了?”)时,为什么说话者会给出非完整句子的回答(“看电影”)而不是完整句子的回答(“我去看电影了”)?我们研究了语用因素(礼貌和正式程度)以及记忆因素(说话者检索问题答案的能力)在决定说话者是否给出非完整句子回答时所起的作用。参与者回答了一系列关于他们生活的问题。语用因素影响了参与者的回答。被指示要礼貌或正式的说话者给出的非完整句子回答比未收到特定指示的说话者要少。记忆检索(通过参与者开始回答所需的时间以及回答开始时是否存在言语不流畅来衡量)与非完整句子回答的产生并没有直接关系。反应潜伏期和言语不流畅的影响取决于参与者是否被告知要礼貌或正式(或者他们根本没有得到任何指示)。

相似文献

1
Non-sentential responses to requests for information.对信息请求的非句子性回应。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1207-1225. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01645-1. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Elliptical Responses to Direct and Indirect Requests for Information.对直接和间接信息请求的迂回反应。
Lang Speech. 2024 Mar;67(1):228-254. doi: 10.1177/00238309231176526. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
Cortical processing of speaker politeness: Tracking the dynamic effects of voice tone and politeness markers.说话者礼貌的皮质处理:追踪语音语调与礼貌标记的动态效应。
Soc Neurosci. 2021 Aug;16(4):423-438. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1938667. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Gesturing during disfluent speech: A pragmatic account.口吃时的手势:实用主义的解释。
Cognition. 2024 Sep;250:105855. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105855. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
5
Bossy and nice requests: varying language register in speakers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).专横与友善的请求:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者语言语域的变化
J Commun Disord. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
6
Please and no, thank you: politeness norms alter compliance more when refusing than when making or acquiescing to a request.请,不,谢谢:在拒绝时比在提出或默许请求时,礼貌规范对服从的影响更大。
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul 4;162(4):471-484. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1921681. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Combined predictive effects of sentential and visual constraints in early audiovisual speech processing.句子和视觉约束在早期视听言语加工中的综合预测作用。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 27;9(1):7870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44311-2.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
The effect of lexical accessibility on Spanish-English intra-sentential codeswitching.词汇可及性对西班牙语-英语句内转码的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):163-180. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01069-7.
10
Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance.人际请求的神经反应:强加和口头表达立场的影响。
Brain Res. 2020 Aug 1;1740:146855. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146855. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language.效率如何塑造人类语言。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):389-407. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
The strategic use of noise in pragmatic reasoning.语用推理中噪声的策略性运用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;7(2):336-50. doi: 10.1111/tops.12144. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
Info/information theory: speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts.信息论:在预测性语境中,说话者会选择更简短的词。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
Becoming syntactic.变得符合句法规则。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):234-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234.
5
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.在自然口语中使用“呃”和“嗯”。
Cognition. 2002 May;84(1):73-111. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3.
6
Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production.歧义性和词汇可得性对句法及词汇生成的影响。
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Jun;40(4):296-340. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0730.
7
Polite responses to polite requests.对礼貌请求的礼貌回应。
Cognition. 1980 Jun;8(2):111-43. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8.
8
Monitoring and self-repair in speech.言语中的监测与自我修复。
Cognition. 1983 Jul;14(1):41-104. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4.