Bicki Alexandra C, Grimes Barbara, McCulloch Charles E, Copeland Timothy P, Ku Elaine
Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA. 2024 Dec 17;332(23):2003-2013. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.18210.
Patient to staff ratios vary across US dialysis facilities and have been associated with patient outcomes in older adults.
To determine whether patient to nurse or patient to social worker staff ratios are associated with access to kidney transplant for adolescents and young adults.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study including patients aged 12 to 30 years who started dialysis between 2005 and 2019 at 8490 US facilities according to the US Renal Data System, the national end-stage kidney disease registry.
Time-updated quartile of patient to nurse and patient to social worker ratios at dialysis facilities.
Fine-Gray models were used to relate the exposure to the incidence of waitlisting and kidney transplant, accounting for the competing risk of death. Subgroup analysis by age at dialysis initiation (<22 vs ≥22 years) was performed. Follow-up was censored in January 2020.
A total of 54 141 participants were included (median age, 25 years [IQR, 21-28]; 54.4% male; 4.3% of Asian race, 35.3% of non-Hispanic Black race). The median patient to staff ratios were 14.4 patients per nurse (IQR, 10.3-18.9) and 91.0 patients per social worker (IQR, 65.2-115.0). During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 39.9% of patients (n = 21 598) received a transplant. In adjusted analysis, the highest (vs lowest) quartile of patient to nurse ratios was associated with 14% lower incidence of transplant (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.91]). The highest (vs lowest) quartile of patient to social worker ratios was associated with lower incidence of waitlisting (SHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]) and transplant (SHR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81-0.89]). For both staff ratios, there was an interaction with age at dialysis initiation, such that the association was more pronounced in patients starting dialysis at younger than 22 years (SHR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.65-0.78] for the highest vs lowest quartile for nursing; SHR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68-0.80] for social work) compared with those 22 years and older (SHR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.94-1.06] for nursing; SHR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.02] for social work) for the outcome of transplant.
Adolescents and young adults receiving care at dialysis facilities with higher patient to staff ratios had reduced access to waitlisting and transplant, particularly if they were younger than 22 years of age at dialysis initiation.
美国各透析机构的患者与工作人员比例各不相同,且与老年人的患者预后相关。
确定患者与护士或患者与社会工作者的工作人员比例是否与青少年和年轻成年人获得肾脏移植的机会相关。
设计、设置和参与者:回顾性队列研究,纳入了2005年至2019年期间在美国8490家机构开始透析的12至30岁患者,数据来源于美国肾脏数据系统,即国家终末期肾病登记处。
透析机构中患者与护士及患者与社会工作者比例的时间更新四分位数。
使用Fine-Gray模型将暴露因素与列入等待名单和肾脏移植的发生率相关联,同时考虑死亡这一竞争风险。按开始透析时的年龄(<22岁与≥22岁)进行亚组分析。随访于2020年1月截尾。
共纳入54141名参与者(中位年龄25岁[四分位间距,21 - 28岁];54.4%为男性;4.3%为亚裔,35.3%为非西班牙裔黑人)。患者与工作人员的中位比例分别为每护士14.4名患者(四分位间距,10.3 - 18.9)和每社会工作者91.0名患者(四分位间距,65.2 - 115.0)。在中位随访2.6年期间,39.9%的患者(n = 21598)接受了移植。在调整分析中,患者与护士比例最高(与最低)四分位数与移植发生率降低14%相关(亚风险比[SHR],0.86[95%置信区间,0.82 - 0.91])。患者与社会工作者比例最高(与最低)四分位数与列入等待名单(SHR,0.95[95%置信区间,0.91 - 0.99])和移植(SHR,0.85[95%置信区间,0.81 - 0.89])的发生率降低相关。对于这两种工作人员比例,均与开始透析时的年龄存在交互作用,即与22岁及以上患者相比,开始透析时年龄小于22岁的患者这种关联更为明显(移植结局方面,护理的最高与最低四分位数相比,SHR为0.71[95%置信区间,0.65 - 0.78];社会工作为SHR,0.74[95%置信区间,0.68 - 0.80]),而22岁及以上患者护理方面SHR为1.00[95%置信区间,0.94 - 1.06];社会工作为SHR,0.96[95%置信区间,0.91 - 1.02])。
在患者与工作人员比例较高的透析机构接受治疗的青少年和年轻成年人获得等待名单和移植的机会减少,尤其是在开始透析时年龄小于22岁的人群中。