Suppr超能文献

下行静脉造影:三种方法的比较及深静脉反流正常范围的评估

Descending phlebography: a comparison of three methods and an assessment of the normal range of deep vein reflux.

作者信息

Thomas M L, Keeling F P, Ackroyd J S

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 Jan-Feb;27(1):27-30.

PMID:3944177
Abstract

Twenty-three legs in 13 patients without evidence of deep vein disease have been examined by descending phlebography using 3 techniques: with the patient semi-erect with no Valsalva manoeuvre with the patient semi-erect with a controlled Valsalva manoeuvre and with the patient supine with a standard Valsalva manoeuvre. It is concluded that the examination performed with the patient supine, using a standard Valsalva manoeuvre, is the most convenient and easiest to interpret of the variation. It is also suggested that deep vein reflux up to Grade 2 is within the normal range.

摘要

对13例无深静脉疾病证据的患者的23条腿进行了下行静脉造影检查,采用了3种技术:患者半直立且不做瓦尔萨尔瓦动作、患者半直立且做受控瓦尔萨尔瓦动作、患者仰卧且做标准瓦尔萨尔瓦动作。得出的结论是,患者仰卧并采用标准瓦尔萨尔瓦动作进行的检查是最方便且最易于解读变异情况的。还表明2级及以下的深静脉反流在正常范围内。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验