Crabtree Meghan A, Stanley Linda R, Prince Mark A, Swaim Randall C
Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research, Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1879 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1879, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Dec;134:104617. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104617. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
Reservation-area American Indian (AI) youth use cannabis at significantly higher rates than their national counterparts. This discrepancy is concerning, as cannabis use-particularly heavy use-can negatively impact adolescents' health. Studies primarily use frequency to classify cannabis use intensity; however, frequency alone may not fully capture heterogenous patterns of use. This study aimed to classify AI adolescents' cannabis use based on multiple intensity indicators, and to investigate interclass differences in problematic characteristics and outcomes of use.
Participants were 799 reservation-area AI youth (7-12th grade) reporting 12-month cannabis use. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to distinguish cannabis use intensity patterns based on frequency, typical intoxication levels and duration. Auxiliary tests using R3STEP and BCH 3-step procedures were used to assess class predictors (age, initiation age, sex) and interclass differences in simultaneous drug use, stress-motivated use, problems quitting and cannabis-related consequences.
Four classes emerged: Light Use (LU; 19 %), Occasional Intoxication (OI; 32 %), Mid-frequency Use(MU; 28 %), and Heavy Use (HU; 21 %). Age and initiation age correlated with membership odds in a heavier use class. Interclass differences in problematic characteristics and outcomes occurred between all classes, particularly for stress-motivated use and cannabis-related consequences-with HU reporting the most problematic characteristics and negative outcomes.
These findings suggest that accounting for multiple dimensions of usage intensity may be important in studies examining cannabis use and related problems among AI adolescents. Tailoring intervention programming to address complex cannabis use patterns, with particular focus on stress-coping skills and harm reduction, can ensure AI youth most at risk for cannabis problems gain maximal benefit from prevention efforts.
保留地美国印第安(AI)青年使用大麻的比例显著高于美国其他地区的同龄人。这种差异令人担忧,因为使用大麻——尤其是大量使用——会对青少年的健康产生负面影响。以往研究主要使用频率来划分大麻使用强度;然而,仅频率可能无法完全捕捉到不同的使用模式。本研究旨在基于多个强度指标对AI青少年的大麻使用进行分类,并调查不同类别在使用问题特征和后果方面的差异。
研究对象为799名报告在过去12个月内使用过大麻的保留地AI青年(7至12年级)。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)根据使用频率、典型中毒水平和持续时间来区分大麻使用强度模式。使用R3STEP和BCH三步程序进行辅助测试,以评估类别预测因素(年龄、开始使用年龄、性别)以及在同时使用其他药物、因压力而使用、难以戒断和大麻相关后果方面的类别差异。
出现了四类:轻度使用(LU;19%)、偶尔中毒(OI;32%)、中频使用(MU;28%)和重度使用(HU;21%)。年龄和开始使用年龄与更高使用强度类别的成员概率相关。所有类别在问题特征和后果方面均存在类别差异,特别是在因压力而使用和大麻相关后果方面——重度使用组报告的问题特征和负面后果最多。
这些发现表明,在研究AI青少年的大麻使用及相关问题时,考虑使用强度的多个维度可能很重要。针对复杂的大麻使用模式制定干预计划,特别关注压力应对技能和减少危害,可确保面临大麻问题风险最高的AI青年从预防措施中获得最大益处。