• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无截骨术和固定的泄殖腔外翻修复术:失败之路。

Cloacal Exstrophy Closure Without Osteotomy and Immobilization: A Recipe for Failure.

作者信息

Heap David, Haffar Ahmad, Crigger Chad B, Martheswaran Tanisha, Hirsch Alexander, Maxon Victoria, Sponseller Paul D, Di Carlo Heather N, Gearhart John P

机构信息

Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institutions, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jan;60(1):161995. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161995. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161995
PMID:39442330
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cloacal exstrophy (CE) remains one of the most severe birth defects compatible with life with a constellation of anomalies involving the bladder, genitalia, hindgut, and spinal cord. Pelvic osteotomy and immobilization have been utilized to facilitate bladder closure, yet their role as adjuncts remains a topic of debate. The authors sought to evaluate the outcomes of CE closure without the use of osteotomy or lower extremity (LE)/pelvic immobilization.

METHODS

An institutional database of 173 CE patients was reviewed for patients closed without osteotomy and/or limb immobilization. Patient records were reviewed for continence procedures, reclosure operations, and continence outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 59 closure surgeries that met inclusion criteria were identified in 56 unique patients. Thirty-seven closure procedures developed eventual failure (63%) with secondary closure events also resulting in failure. Most closures did not use an osteotomy, 93.2%. LE immobilization-only was used in most closures (43/59), of which only 37% were successful. Failures were attributed to dehiscence (14/37), bladder prolapse (19/37), or both dehiscence and prolapse (4/37). The median age at closure was 3 days old (1-18.5 IQR) with the majority of closure events (47) closure events taking place in the newborn period. Median diastasis prior to primary closure was 6 cm (4.8-8 cm IQR). The median number of closure attempts needed to close the bladder was 2 (1-2 IQR). Of the 56 patients, 31 have >3 h of daytime continence, with the entirety of these patients catheterizing a stoma or below.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the critical role of osteotomy and lower limb immobilization in successful closure of the bladder and abdominal wall in CE.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

泄殖腔外翻(CE)仍然是最严重的与生命相容的出生缺陷之一,伴有一系列涉及膀胱、生殖器、后肠和脊髓的异常。骨盆截骨术和固定术已被用于促进膀胱闭合,但其作为辅助手段的作用仍存在争议。作者试图评估在不使用截骨术或下肢(LE)/骨盆固定术的情况下CE闭合的结果。

方法

回顾了一个包含173例CE患者的机构数据库,以查找未进行截骨术和/或肢体固定术而闭合的患者。查阅患者记录,了解控尿程序、再次闭合手术和控尿结果。

结果

在56例独特患者中,共确定了59例符合纳入标准的闭合手术。37例闭合手术最终失败(63%),二次闭合手术也导致失败。大多数闭合手术未使用截骨术,占93.2%。大多数闭合手术(43/59)仅使用了LE固定术,其中只有37%成功。失败归因于裂开(14/37)、膀胱脱垂(19/37)或裂开和脱垂两者(4/37)。闭合时的中位年龄为3天(1-18.5四分位间距),大多数闭合事件(47例)发生在新生儿期。初次闭合前的中位分离距离为6厘米(4.8-8厘米四分位间距)。闭合膀胱所需的中位闭合尝试次数为2次(1-2四分位间距)。在56例患者中,31例白天控尿时间超过3小时,所有这些患者均通过导尿口或其下方进行导尿。

结论

这些结果突出了截骨术和下肢固定术在CE患者膀胱和腹壁成功闭合中的关键作用。

研究类型

治疗研究。

证据级别

三级。

相似文献

1
Cloacal Exstrophy Closure Without Osteotomy and Immobilization: A Recipe for Failure.无截骨术和固定的泄殖腔外翻修复术:失败之路。
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jan;60(1):161995. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161995. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
The failed bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: Management and outcomes.先天性膀胱外翻中失败的膀胱关闭术:处理方法和结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2416-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
3
Impact of pelvic immobilization techniques on the outcomes of primary and secondary closures of classic bladder exstrophy.骨盆固定技术对经典膀胱外翻一期和二期修复术结局的影响。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):382.e1-382.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Pelvic and lower extremity immobilization for cloacal exstrophy bladder and abdominal closure in neonates and older children.新生儿及大龄儿童泄殖腔外翻膀胱和腹壁关闭术的盆腔及下肢固定术
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2160-2163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Fixation with lower limb immobilization in primary and secondary exstrophy closure: A saving grace.在原发性和继发性膀胱外翻修复术中采用下肢固定固定法:一项幸事。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Apr;19(2):179.e1-179.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.12.009. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Bladder exstrophy closure in the newborn period with external pelvic fixation performed without osteotomy: A preliminary report.新生儿期无截骨术的外部骨盆固定膀胱外翻闭合术:初步报告。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Feb;14(1):32.e1-32.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
7
Newborn exstrophy closure without osteotomy: Is there a role?不进行截骨术的新生儿膀胱外翻闭合术:有作用吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):51.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
8
Multi-staged vs Single-staged Pelvic Osteotomy in the Modern Treatment of Cloacal Exstrophy: Bridging the Gap.多阶段与单阶段骨盆截骨术在 Cloacal Exstrophy 现代治疗中的比较:弥合差距。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Dec;58(12):2308-2312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
9
Predictors of a successful primary bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: A multivariable analysis.泄殖腔外翻一期膀胱关闭成功的预测因素:多变量分析
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):491-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
10
Pelvic and extremity immobilization after bladder exstrophy closure: complications and impact on success.膀胱外翻修复术后盆腔及四肢固定:并发症及对手术成功的影响
Urology. 2003 Dec;62(6):1109-13. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00791-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cloacal exstrophy management in a  low- and middle-income country (LMIC): comparative outcomes of direct versus staged closure and a multidisciplinary risk-stratified protocol.低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)泄殖腔外翻的治疗:直接闭合与分期闭合的比较结果及多学科风险分层方案
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 8;41(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06061-3.