Preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty is feasible with computed tomography at lower-than-conventional radiation doses.

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) offers a detailed assessment of the shoulder for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning; however, this technique exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the practicality of reducing the CT radiation dose compared to conventional dose levels for manual and preoperative planning software measurements for shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 10 shoulder CT examinations were performed for preoperative planning purposes on a dual x-ray source CT scanner. A specialized dose-split scan technique was utilized to reconstruct CT images corresponding to 100%, 70%, and 30% radiation dose relative to our institution's standard of care imaging protocol. Glenoid version, inclination, and humeral head subluxation were measured manually by 3 authors and by commercially available software platforms. These measurements were analyzed for agreement among the 100%, 70%, and 30% dose levels for each patient. Tolerances of 5° of glenoid version, 5° of glenoid inclination, and 10% humeral head subluxation were used as equivalent for preoperative planning.

RESULTS

Automated measurements of 70% dose images were within 5° of version, 5° of inclination, and 10% subluxation in 95.0% of cases. Manual measurements of 70% RD images were within 5° of version for 90.0% of cases, 5° of inclination in 86.7% of cases, and 10% subluxation in 100% of cases. Automated measurements from the 30% dose images were within 5° of version, 5° of inclination, and 10% subluxation for 100% of cases. Manual measurements from the 30% dose images were within 5° of version for 86.7% of cases, 5° of inclination in 76.7% of cases, and 10% subluxation in 100% of cases. The mean absolute difference in software measurement of glenoid version (P = .96), glenoid inclination (P = .64), or humeral head subluxation (P = .09) or in aggregated manual mean absolute difference of version (P = .22), inclination (P = .31), or humeral head subluxation (P = .56) was not significant. Good to excellent reliability was determined by interclass correlation coefficients among the manual observers and automatic software platforms for measurements at all doses (P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that both preoperative planning software platforms and human observers produced similar measurements of glenoid version, inclination, and humeral head subluxation from reduced-dose images compared to standard of care doses. By implementing reduced dose techniques in preoperative shoulder CT, the potential risks associated with radiation exposure could be reduced for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.