Suppr超能文献

评估电子病历中困难气道警报的效果:一项质量改进研究。

Assessing the efficacy of difficult airway alerts in electronic medical records: a quality improvement study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02747-8.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of difficult airway alerts in a major tertiary centre.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the completeness, utility and efficacy of difficult airway alerts and their impact on future airway management episodes.

DESIGN, DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Patients who had a "difficult airway" entry on electronic medical records (EMR) from 2011 to 2021 were included. Each alert was analyzed by a team of anesthetists with expertise in difficult airway management for its quality, appropriateness, and impact on future airway management episodes. Alert quality was defined as to whether the content of the alert contained pertinent information for emergent airway management. Alert appropriateness was defined as to whether the experts would be unhappy to perform a rapid sequence induction and intubation, if required, following review of all available documentation.

RESULTS

141 patients were included for this study, with a mean age of 58.6 +/- 15.3 years. Ninety-three (66%) alerts were created by medical staff, of which 52 were recorded by consultant anesthetists. 117 alerts (83%) were deemed to be appropriate by the airway expert team, but only 40 alerts (28%) were found to have sufficient quality to be helpful in emergent airway management. Sixty-five patients (47%) had at least one subsequent airway management episode, of which 35 patients (56%) underwent a change of management following alert creation. We proceeded to modify 103 alerts (73%) to improve their quality to aid future encounters.

CONCLUSION

Difficult Airway encounters are an uncommon event in anesthesia, but clear, comprehensive and effectively communicated documentation is required to minimize the risk in future encounters. In our institution, while most difficult airway alerts were appropriate, we found significant heterogeneity in the quality of this documentation, which limits the clinical utility of the alert system. We have taken measures to improve local processes of difficult airway documentation and considered the implications of our project for the broader airway management community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

研究设计

对一个主要的三级中心的困难气道警报进行回顾性分析。

目的

调查困难气道警报的完整性、实用性和有效性,及其对未来气道管理事件的影响。

设计、数据来源和方法:纳入了 2011 年至 2021 年电子病历(EMR)上有“困难气道”记录的患者。每个警报都由一组具有困难气道管理专业知识的麻醉师进行分析,以评估其质量、适当性以及对未来气道管理事件的影响。警报质量定义为警报中是否包含紧急气道管理所需的相关信息。警报适当性定义为,如果需要,在审查所有可用文件后,专家是否不愿意进行快速序贯诱导和插管。

结果

本研究纳入了 141 例患者,平均年龄为 58.6 +/- 15.3 岁。93 例(66%)警报由医务人员创建,其中 52 例由顾问麻醉师记录。117 例(83%)警报被气道专家团队认为是适当的,但只有 40 例(28%)警报被认为具有足够的质量,有助于紧急气道管理。65 例(47%)至少有一次后续气道管理事件,其中 35 例(56%)在警报创建后改变了管理方式。我们继续修改了 103 例(73%)警报,以提高其质量,以帮助未来的遭遇。

结论

困难气道事件在麻醉中并不常见,但需要清晰、全面和有效地记录文档,以最大限度地降低未来遭遇的风险。在我们的机构中,虽然大多数困难气道警报是适当的,但我们发现这些文档的质量存在显著的异质性,这限制了警报系统的临床实用性。我们已经采取措施改进当地困难气道文档记录的流程,并考虑了我们的项目对更广泛的气道管理社区的影响。

试验注册

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11f/11515682/dcde1756717b/12871_2024_2747_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验