Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Gelişim University, Avcılar/Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Zeytinburnu /Istanbul, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05059-y.
This study aimed to compare the acceptability of removable acrylic appliances (RA) and Invisalign First (IF) clear aligners (Aligntech, USA) among children undergoing orthodontic treatment during the mixed dentition period, considering the severity of malocclusions.
A total of 40 patients, aged 6 to 13 years, were recruited for the study. Malocclusion severity was evaluated using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC). Patients completed the "Acceptance of Orthodontic Appliance Scale (AOAS)" via a face-to-face Google survey. To assess the reliability of the AOAS, the survey was resent to five patients after three months for a second response, and reliability analysis was conducted. Additionally, inter-rater reliability was evaluated by having all patients independently assessed by a second researcher. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Although no significant difference was found in IOTN-DHC scores, the IF group demonstrated significantly higher AOAS scores compared to the RA group (p = 0.014). Survey responses revealed noticeable distinctions between groups regarding speaking discomfort, preference for orthodontic appliances, and facial appearance comfort. A negative correlation (r = -0.477, p = 0.034) was observed between malocclusion severity and appliance acceptance.
This study underscores the significant superiority and advantage of IF over RA among pediatric orthodontic patients during the mixed dentition period.
本研究旨在比较混合牙列期接受正畸治疗的儿童对可摘式丙烯酸矫治器(RA)和 Invisalign First(IF)透明矫治器(Aligntech,美国)的可接受性,同时考虑错颌畸形的严重程度。
共招募了 40 名 6 至 13 岁的患者参与研究。错颌畸形严重程度采用正畸治疗需求指数-牙健康成分(IOTN-DHC)进行评估。患者通过谷歌的面对面调查完成“正畸矫治器接受度量表(AOAS)”。为了评估 AOAS 的可靠性,三个月后向五名患者重新发送调查以获取第二次回复,并进行可靠性分析。此外,通过让所有患者由第二位研究人员独立评估,评估了组间的可靠性。使用 SPSS Statistics 版本 26(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,USA)进行数据分析,统计学意义设定为 p<0.05。
虽然 IOTN-DHC 评分没有显著差异,但 IF 组的 AOAS 评分明显高于 RA 组(p=0.014)。调查结果显示,两组在说话不适、对正畸矫治器的偏好以及面部外观舒适度方面存在明显差异。错颌畸形严重程度与矫治器接受度之间存在负相关(r=-0.477,p=0.034)。
本研究强调了在混合牙列期,IF 对儿科正畸患者具有明显优于 RA 的优越性和优势。