• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children in mixed dentition treated with removable acrylic appliances and Invisalign first: a cross-sectional study.可摘式丙烯酸矫治器和 Invisalign First 矫治器治疗混合牙列期儿童的可接受性比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05059-y.
2
FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.用于功能性前牙反合早期正畸治疗的固定或可摘矫治器。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2015(238):10-72.
3
The impact of general self-efficacy and the severity of malocclusion on acceptance of removable orthodontic appliances in 10- to 12-year-old patients.一般自我效能感和错颌畸形严重程度对 10-12 岁患者对可摘正畸矫治器的接受程度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01293-2.
4
A randomized controlled trial of self-perceived pain, discomfort, and impairment of jaw function in children undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances.一项关于接受固定或可摘矫治器正畸治疗的儿童自我感知疼痛、不适及颌功能损害的随机对照试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):324-30. doi: 10.2319/040215-219.1. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
Effects of clear aligners and traditional removable appliances on oral microbiome in mixed dentition: a comparative study.透明牙套和传统可摘矫治器对混合牙列口腔微生物组的影响:一项比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1276. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05063-2.
6
Impact of Invisalign® first system on molar width and incisor torque in malocclusion during the mixed dentition period.Invisalign® 第一代系统对混合牙列期错颌中磨牙宽度和切牙转矩的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038742.
7
[Orthodontic treatment for malocclusions in mixed dentition].[混合牙列错牙合畸形的正畸治疗]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 9;59(9):886-891. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240527-00222.
8
Upper arch dimensional changes with clear aligners in the early mixed dentition : A prospective study.早期混合牙列中使用透明矫治器时上颌牙弓尺寸的变化:一项前瞻性研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Jan;84(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00332-z. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
Anterior crossbite correction in primary and mixed dentition with removable inclined plane (Bruckl appliance).使用可摘式斜面矫治器(布鲁克尔矫治器)矫治乳牙列和混合牙列期的前牙反合
Stomatologija. 2008;10(4):140-4.
10
The contemporary use of removable orthodontic appliances.可摘矫治器的当代应用。
Dent Update. 2004 May;31(4):215-8. doi: 10.12968/denu.2004.31.4.215.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions and Practices of Pediatric Dentists on Clear Aligner Therapy in Mixed Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Survey.混合牙列期儿童牙医对透明矫治器治疗的认知与实践:一项横断面调查
Cureus. 2025 Aug 2;17(8):e89258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89258. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
AI-driven dynamic orthodontic treatment management: personalized progress tracking and adjustments-a narrative review.人工智能驱动的动态正畸治疗管理:个性化进展跟踪与调整——一篇叙述性综述
Front Dent Med. 2025 Aug 1;6:1612441. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1612441. eCollection 2025.
3
Clinical Effectiveness of Clear Aligner Therapy During Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.青少年患者阻断性正畸治疗中使用透明矫治器疗法的临床疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 Jul 17;17(7):e88157. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88157. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Early Intervention with Palatal Expansion Versus Late Orthodontic Treatment for Correcting Maxillary Crowding.早期腭扩张干预与晚期正畸治疗矫正上颌拥挤的效果比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S555-S557. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_862_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Treatment effects after maxillary expansion using invisalign first system vs. acrylic splint expander in mixed dentition: a prospective cohort study.使用 Invisalign 第一代系统与混合牙列中的丙烯酸夹板扩弓器对上颌骨扩张后的治疗效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 27;23(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03312-4.
3
Investigation and comparison of patient experiences with removable functional appliances.可摘性功能矫治器的患者体验调查与比较。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):490-495. doi: 10.2319/050520-393.1.
4
The impact of general self-efficacy and the severity of malocclusion on acceptance of removable orthodontic appliances in 10- to 12-year-old patients.一般自我效能感和错颌畸形严重程度对 10-12 岁患者对可摘正畸矫治器的接受程度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01293-2.
5
Parental influence is the most important predictor of child's orthodontic treatment demand in a preadolescent age.父母的影响是预测儿童在青春期前接受正畸治疗需求的最重要因素。
Odontology. 2020 Jan;108(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00447-1. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Patient satisfaction and quality of life status after 2 treatment modalities: Invisalign and conventional fixed appliances.两种治疗方式(Invisalign 隐形矫正和传统固定矫正器)后的患者满意度和生活质量状况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Nov;154(5):639-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.013.
7
Objectively measured compliance during early orthodontic treatment: Do treatment needs have an impact?早期正畸治疗期间的客观测量依从性:治疗需求有影响吗?
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;26(1):83-87. doi: 10.17219/acem/62107.
8
Differential diagnosis and treatment planning for early mixed dentition malocclusions.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4 Suppl):S80-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.021.
9
Interceptive orthodontics in the real world of community dentistry.社区牙科现实环境中的阻断性正畸
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000 Jun;10(2):99-108. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2000.00178.x.
10
The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority.正畸治疗优先级指数的制定。
Eur J Orthod. 1989 Aug;11(3):309-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999.

可摘式丙烯酸矫治器和 Invisalign First 矫治器治疗混合牙列期儿童的可接受性比较:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children in mixed dentition treated with removable acrylic appliances and Invisalign first: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Gelişim University, Avcılar/Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Zeytinburnu /Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05059-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05059-y
PMID:39443888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515626/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the acceptability of removable acrylic appliances (RA) and Invisalign First (IF) clear aligners (Aligntech, USA) among children undergoing orthodontic treatment during the mixed dentition period, considering the severity of malocclusions.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients, aged 6 to 13 years, were recruited for the study. Malocclusion severity was evaluated using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC). Patients completed the "Acceptance of Orthodontic Appliance Scale (AOAS)" via a face-to-face Google survey. To assess the reliability of the AOAS, the survey was resent to five patients after three months for a second response, and reliability analysis was conducted. Additionally, inter-rater reliability was evaluated by having all patients independently assessed by a second researcher. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Although no significant difference was found in IOTN-DHC scores, the IF group demonstrated significantly higher AOAS scores compared to the RA group (p = 0.014). Survey responses revealed noticeable distinctions between groups regarding speaking discomfort, preference for orthodontic appliances, and facial appearance comfort. A negative correlation (r = -0.477, p = 0.034) was observed between malocclusion severity and appliance acceptance.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study underscores the significant superiority and advantage of IF over RA among pediatric orthodontic patients during the mixed dentition period.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较混合牙列期接受正畸治疗的儿童对可摘式丙烯酸矫治器(RA)和 Invisalign First(IF)透明矫治器(Aligntech,美国)的可接受性,同时考虑错颌畸形的严重程度。

方法

共招募了 40 名 6 至 13 岁的患者参与研究。错颌畸形严重程度采用正畸治疗需求指数-牙健康成分(IOTN-DHC)进行评估。患者通过谷歌的面对面调查完成“正畸矫治器接受度量表(AOAS)”。为了评估 AOAS 的可靠性,三个月后向五名患者重新发送调查以获取第二次回复,并进行可靠性分析。此外,通过让所有患者由第二位研究人员独立评估,评估了组间的可靠性。使用 SPSS Statistics 版本 26(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,USA)进行数据分析,统计学意义设定为 p<0.05。

结果

虽然 IOTN-DHC 评分没有显著差异,但 IF 组的 AOAS 评分明显高于 RA 组(p=0.014)。调查结果显示,两组在说话不适、对正畸矫治器的偏好以及面部外观舒适度方面存在明显差异。错颌畸形严重程度与矫治器接受度之间存在负相关(r=-0.477,p=0.034)。

临床意义

本研究强调了在混合牙列期,IF 对儿科正畸患者具有明显优于 RA 的优越性和优势。