Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Nov;34(11):e14747. doi: 10.1111/sms.14747.
Children and adults may react differently to warm-up preservation due to different physical characteristics. This study aimed to: (i) assess the impact of different rewarm-up routines in swimmers during a transition phase (20-25 min), including passive rest (SWU) or dynamic activities (RWU), on countermovement jump and swimming start performances, and (ii) explore potential RWU adaptations considering maturity offset (peak height velocity-PHV) and sex. Performance was analyzed using mixed effect ANCOVA, considering protocol, maturity offset (pre-PHV, mid-PHV, post-PHV, and adv. post-PHV), and sex. Results favored RWU over SWU with substantial magnitudes for jump height: pre-PHV (min-20, ES = 1.21; min-25, ES = 1.65), mid-PHV (min-20, ES = 1.23; min-25, ES = 1.14), post-PHV (min-20, ES = 1.37; min-25, ES = 0.73), and adv. post-PHV (min-20, ES = 1.03; min-25, ES = 0.65). Significant interactions at 25 min (p = 0.033, 0.047) showed that RWU outperformed SWU, especially in younger groups (pre-PHV, mid-PHV). RWU was superior to SWU for the reactive strength index at 20 min (p = 0.042) and 25 min (p = 0.047), with females having lower RSI than males at 20 min (p = 0.008, p = 0.015) and 25 min (p = 0.049) in later developmental stages. The flight distance (p = 0.009) and horizontal hip velocity (p = 0.014) revealed significant three-way interactions, with the male adv. post-PHV group responding better to RWU. Knee angular velocity was also higher after RWU, with male adv. post-PHV group showing more pronounced improvements (p = 0.016). These results suggest that though RWU had higher influence in male adults, it is a valuable approach for varying ages athletes.
儿童和成人由于身体特征不同,对热身恢复的反应可能不同。本研究旨在:(i) 评估在过渡阶段(20-25 分钟)中,游泳运动员在被动休息(SWU)或动态活动(RWU)两种不同的再热身方案对反跳和游泳出发表现的影响,以及 (ii) 考虑成熟度偏移(峰值身高速度-PHV)和性别,探索潜在的 RWU 适应。使用混合效应协方差分析考虑方案、成熟度偏移(pre-PHV、mid-PHV、post-PHV 和 adv.post-PHV)和性别来分析表现。结果表明 RWU 优于 SWU,反跳高度有较大的效应量:pre-PHV(min-20,ES=1.21;min-25,ES=1.65)、mid-PHV(min-20,ES=1.23;min-25,ES=1.14)、post-PHV(min-20,ES=1.37;min-25,ES=0.73)和 adv.post-PHV(min-20,ES=1.03;min-25,ES=0.65)。25 分钟时的显著交互作用(p=0.033,0.047)表明,RWU 在年轻组(pre-PHV、mid-PHV)中的表现优于 SWU。20 分钟(p=0.042)和 25 分钟(p=0.047)时,RWU 对反应强度指数的影响优于 SWU,20 分钟时女性的 RSI 低于男性(p=0.008,p=0.015),25 分钟时女性在发育后期的 RSI 低于男性(p=0.049)。飞行距离(p=0.009)和水平髋速度(p=0.014)显示出显著的三向交互作用,男性 adv.post-PHV 组对 RWU 的反应更好。RWU 后膝关节角速度也较高,男性 adv.post-PHV 组的改善更为明显(p=0.016)。这些结果表明,尽管 RWU 对男性成年人的影响更大,但它是一种对不同年龄段运动员都有价值的方法。