• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住老年人辅助机器人进行认知评估的评分者间和评分者内信度:一项初步研究。

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of cognitive assessment conducted by assistive robot for older adults living in the community: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Nishiura Yuko, Inoue Takenobu, Takaeda Kana, Kamimura Tomoko

机构信息

Occupational Therapy Sciences, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Assistive Technology, National Rehabilitation Centre for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Japan.

出版信息

Psychogeriatrics. 2025 Jan;25(1):e13203. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13203. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/psyg.13203
PMID:39444248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631570/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to reveal inter- and intra-rater reliability of the detailed evaluation of cognitive function by assistive robot for older adults.

METHODS

We investigated the inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination was conducted twice for each participant using an assistive robot and the examiner respectively (Experiment 1). The order of these two tests was randomly selected and the interval between them was 1 week. In Experiment 2, we investigated the test-retest reliability of the first robot test and this additional robot test was conducted approximately 6 weeks after Experiment 1.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (13 men and 38 women, mean age: 80.5 ± 5.6 years) participants went through Experiment 1 and 29 of those (eight men and 21 women, mean age: 80.4 ± 4.8 years) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the interclass coefficient (ICC) in orientation was in the high range and its Cronbach's α was 0.919, rated as excellent internal consistency. On the other hand, other items did not show positive results. In Experiment 2, the ICCs in orientation, attention, and repetition were in the adequate range, while other items showed marginal or low range.

CONCLUSIONS

Orientation was supposed to be utilised for figuring out initial symptoms of dementia. In the future, as robot functions become more high-tech, a partner robot might be able to measure the symptoms and severity of dementia.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是揭示辅助机器人对老年人认知功能进行详细评估时评分者间和评分者内的可靠性。

方法

我们调查了评分者间信度和重测信度。使用辅助机器人和检查者分别对每位参与者进行两次神经行为认知状态检查(实验1)。这两次测试的顺序随机选择,间隔为1周。在实验2中,我们调查了首次机器人测试的重测信度,该额外的机器人测试在实验1后约6周进行。

结果

51名参与者(13名男性和38名女性,平均年龄:80.5±5.6岁)完成了实验1,其中29名(8名男性和21名女性,平均年龄:80.4±4.8岁)完成了实验2。在实验1中,定向方面的组内相关系数(ICC)处于较高范围,其Cronbach's α为0.919,评定为具有出色的内部一致性。另一方面,其他项目未显示出阳性结果。在实验2中,定向、注意力和复述方面的ICC处于适当范围,而其他项目显示为临界或低范围。

结论

定向可用于识别痴呆的初始症状。未来,随着机器人功能变得更加高科技,伴侣机器人或许能够测量痴呆的症状和严重程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7d5/11631570/bbce54d1c10f/PSYG-25-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7d5/11631570/bbce54d1c10f/PSYG-25-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7d5/11631570/bbce54d1c10f/PSYG-25-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of cognitive assessment conducted by assistive robot for older adults living in the community: a preliminary study.社区居住老年人辅助机器人进行认知评估的评分者间和评分者内信度:一项初步研究。
Psychogeriatrics. 2025 Jan;25(1):e13203. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13203. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Reliability and acceptability of using a social robot to carry out cognitive tests for community-dwelling older adults.使用社交机器人对社区居住的老年人进行认知测试的可靠性和可接受性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Jun;19(6):552-556. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13655. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Reliability of the Japanese version of the Berg balance scale.日本版伯格平衡量表的可靠性。
Intern Med. 2014;53(15):1621-4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2662. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
4
Assessment of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Luna EMG robot as a tool for assessing upper limb proprioception in patients with stroke-a prospective observational study.评估 Luna EMG 机器人作为一种评估脑卒中患者上肢本体感觉的工具的评估者间和评估者内可靠性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 29;12:e17903. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17903. eCollection 2024.
5
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.老年人对辅助机器人的接受度:在生活实验室环境中进行为期 1 个月的人机交互混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014.
6
Reliability of the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) assessment in community-dwelling dementia patients: test consistency and inter-rater agreement.社区居住的痴呆患者感知、回忆、计划和执行(PRPP)评估的可靠性:测试一致性和评分者间一致性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Apr;24(4):659-65. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211002249. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
Intra- and inter- rater reliability of the face‑to‑face assessment and tele‑assessment of performance-based tests in older adults.面对面评估和远程评估老年人基于表现的测试的内部和外部可靠性。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Jun;15(3):601-607. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00946-7. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
8
Examination of reliability and validity of the Self-Assessment Burden Scale-Motor for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a validation study.日本社区居住老年人自我评估负担量表-运动部分的信度和效度检验:一项验证研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 18;12:e17730. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17730. eCollection 2024.
9
Interrater and Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Subsystems With Community-Dwelling Older Adults.平衡评估系统测试(BESTest)及其子系统在社区居住老年人中的评分者间信度、重测信度和最小可检测变化
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Jul/Sep;41(3):173-179. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000117.
10
Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of an adapted Wolf motor function test for older patients with shoulder injuries.针对老年肩部损伤患者的改良版Wolf运动功能测试的评分者间及评分者内信度
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Apr;51(3):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1226-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Voice Recognition Informatic Robots for Effective Communication in Outpatient Settings.优化语音识别信息机器人以实现门诊环境中的有效沟通。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 7;15(9):e44848. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44848. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Robot Voices in Daily Life: Vocal Human-Likeness and Application Context as Determinants of User Acceptance.日常生活中的机器人声音:声音的拟人化程度与应用场景对用户接受度的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:787499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787499. eCollection 2022.
3
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.
2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment by Using Human-Robot Interactions.利用人机交互识别轻度认知障碍。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(3):1129-1142. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215015.
5
The application of an information support robot to reduce agitation in an older adult with Alzheimer's disease living alone in a community dwelling: a case study.应用信息支持机器人减少独居社区住宅的阿尔茨海默病老年患者的激越行为:一项病例研究
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2021 Jun;34(1):50-59. doi: 10.1177/15691861211005059. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Comprehensible instructions from assistive robots for older adults with or without cognitive impairment.来自辅助机器人的、对有或没有认知障碍的老年人易懂的指令。
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):557-562. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1893236. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Effectiveness of using assistive technology for time orientation and memory, in older adults with or without dementia.使用辅助技术进行时间定向和记忆的效果,在有或没有痴呆症的老年人中。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jul;16(5):472-478. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1650299. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Reliability and acceptability of using a social robot to carry out cognitive tests for community-dwelling older adults.使用社交机器人对社区居住的老年人进行认知测试的可靠性和可接受性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Jun;19(6):552-556. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13655. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Effects of Assistive Home Technology on quality of life and falls of people with dementia and job satisfaction of caregivers: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.辅助家居技术对痴呆症患者的生活质量和跌倒以及照顾者工作满意度的影响:一项试点随机对照试验的结果。
Assist Technol. 2020 Sep 2;32(5):243-250. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1531952. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Reversible Dementias.可逆性痴呆。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2018 Nov;34(4):537-562. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 28.