Suppr超能文献

评估核型分析和染色体微阵列在产前诊断中的应用。 (原英文句子存在错误,正确的应该是Evaluate the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis. 这里按照正确内容翻译)

Evaluation the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis.

作者信息

Li Huafeng, Li Yongli, Zhang Yanli, Zhu Jinping, Huang Yuqiang

机构信息

Medical Genetics Department, Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, Linyi 276000, China.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2024 Apr;53(4):837-845. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the difference of the chromosomal abnormalities using karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) as well as to evaluate their application in different prenatal diagnosis indications.

METHODS

Overall, 3007 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications from Medical Genetics Department of Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, who underwent standard G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA, were enrolled from 2018-2022. G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA were undergone simultaneously. All fetuses with genetic variants were enrolled for further analyzing. The frequency and differences of chromosomal abnormalities of the two methods were compared in different prenatal diagnosis indications groups.

RESULTS

CMA improved 4.09% (123/3007) of genetic changes compared karyotype analysis. CMA is on par with karyotyping for detection of aneuploidies and gross unbalanced rearrangements. Serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities were the main indications of prenatal diagnosis. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was highest in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) abnormal group. In the ultrasound abnormality group, the detection rate of genetic variants in nuchal translucency (NT) increased group was higher than other subgroups and there was statistically significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs. CMA can detect 5.57% (40/718) more genetic abnormalities in ultrasound abnormality group on the normal karyotype. CMA improved 0.67% (20/3007) of genetic changes with clinically significant compared karyotype, brought 3.42% (103/3007) of variants with uncertain significance (VOUS).

CONCLUSION

CMA identified additional, clinically significant genetic variants on the basis of normal karyotype analysis, brought a proportion of unclear significant variants. All the pregnant women accepted amniocentesis should be informed about their characteristics of karyotype analysis and CMA by genetic counselors.

摘要

背景

我们旨在比较使用核型分析和染色体微阵列(CMA)检测染色体异常的差异,并评估它们在不同产前诊断指征中的应用。

方法

2018年至2022年期间,共纳入了临沂市妇女儿童医院医学遗传科3007例有产前诊断指征的孕妇,她们均接受了标准G显带核型分析和CMA检测,两种检测同时进行。所有检测到基因变异的胎儿均纳入进一步分析。比较两种方法在不同产前诊断指征组中染色体异常的频率和差异。

结果

与核型分析相比,CMA检测出的基因改变增加了4.09%(123/3007)。在检测非整倍体和明显的不平衡重排方面,CMA与核型分析相当。血清学筛查和超声异常是产前诊断的主要指征。染色体异常检出率在无创产前检测(NIPT)异常组中最高。在超声异常组中,颈部透明带(NT)增厚组的基因变异检出率高于其他亚组,且致病性拷贝数变异(pCNV)的检出率有统计学差异。在超声异常组中,核型正常的情况下,CMA能多检测出5.57%(40/718)的基因异常。与核型分析相比,CMA检测出临床意义明确的基因改变增加了0.67%(20/3007),带来了3.42%(103/3007)意义不明确的变异(VOUS)。

结论

CMA在正常核型分析的基础上,检测出了额外的具有临床意义的基因变异,同时也带来了一部分意义不明确的变异。所有接受羊膜腔穿刺术的孕妇都应由遗传咨询师告知她们核型分析和CMA的特点。

相似文献

1
Evaluation the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis.
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Apr;53(4):837-845. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560.
2
Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03368-y.
4
[Analysis of copy number variation by CMA in fetus with increased nuchal translucency].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;53(10):671-676. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.10.004.
5
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency.
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Feb 27;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/medsci7030040.
7
Clinical application of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Aug;7(8):e811. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.811. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
Chromosomal microarray analysis versus noninvasive prenatal testing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.
J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;67(9):533-539. doi: 10.1038/s10038-022-01041-0. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Chromosomal Abnormalities Detected by Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities.
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Oct 14;17:4645-4658. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S483290. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Potentials and challenges of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 26;13:938183. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.938183. eCollection 2022.
4
The Challenge of Genetic Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance : A Narrative Review.
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):994-1000. doi: 10.7326/M21-4109. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Clinical utility of expanded NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities and etiology analysis of cytogenetic discrepancies cases.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jan;39(1):267-279. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02351-6. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
7
Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03368-y.
8
Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 2466 fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers: a prospective cohort study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):516.e1-516.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.039. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验