• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“……给我找个律师,兄弟”:寻求建议和支持。

"… give me a lawyer, dawg": recognizing for advice and support.

作者信息

Wilford Miko M, Frazier Annabelle

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

School of Criminal Justice, Forensic Science and Security, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1414305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414305. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414305
PMID:39444827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11497267/
Abstract

(1) Youth are particularly vulnerable to making suboptimal legal decisions due to added challenges in comprehension, as well as their ongoing neurological development. (2) This fact is especially problematic in our which frequently expects defendants to determine the outcome of their own cases (by accepting or rejecting plea offers). (3) To better ensure that guilty pleas entered by youthful defendants are indeed knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, legal counsel should be mandatory during any and all juvenile criminal proceedings. (4) Further, an additional "translator" (similar to a ), who has specialized training in developmental psychology, should be present to effectively counsel and support youth defendants who might otherwise fail to comprehend the advice of their attorneys (and other court actors).

摘要

(1)由于理解方面的额外挑战以及他们持续的神经发育,年轻人在做出次优法律决策时特别容易受到影响。(2)在我们的(司法体系)中,这一事实尤其成问题,因为(该体系)常常期望被告自行决定其案件的结果(通过接受或拒绝认罪协议)。(3)为了更好地确保年轻被告做出的认罪答辩确实是明知、明智且自愿的,在任何及所有少年刑事诉讼程序中,法律顾问应是强制性的。(4)此外,应配备一名额外的“翻译者”(类似于一名……),其接受过发展心理学方面的专业培训,以便有效地为那些可能无法理解其律师(及其他法庭人员)建议的年轻被告提供咨询和支持。

相似文献

1
"… give me a lawyer, dawg": recognizing for advice and support.“……给我找个律师,兄弟”:寻求建议和支持。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1414305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414305. eCollection 2024.
2
From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.从谁的角度来看?在确定认罪的自愿性方面,行为人和观察者之间的差异。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;46(5):353-371. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000501.
3
The psychology of defendant plea decision making.被告认罪决策的心理学。
Am Psychol. 2017 May-Jun;72(4):339-352. doi: 10.1037/a0040436.
4
Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers.弗吉尼亚·阿尔福德认罪的人比传统认罪的人经历更严厉的后果。
Law Hum Behav. 2024 Aug;48(4):262-280. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000580.
5
Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.协商正义能力的限制:律师对当前认罪制度中罪与非罪及法律建议的看法
Psychol Crime Law. 2018;24(9):915-934. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1457672. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.青少年和成人认罪表格的内容与可理解性:对明知、明智且自愿认罪的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Apr;39(2):162-76. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000118. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals.青春期前及青少年被告的法律裁决:供述、认罪、与律师沟通及上诉的预测因素。
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Jun;29(3):253-77. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2.
8
An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.一个无法拒绝的提议:辩诉交易的提议规模会影响无辜但非有罪被告对自愿性的看法。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;47(6):619-633. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000548.
9
Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.新冠疫情阴影下的无罪辩护:疫情期间的认罪答辩决策
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):739-750. doi: 10.1037/xap0000367. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Alford pleas in the age of innocence.纯真年代的阿尔福德答辩。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):467-88. doi: 10.1002/bsl.876.

本文引用的文献

1
Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.少年法庭和刑事法庭的认罪听证。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;46(5):337-352. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000495.
2
Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.与父母协商:少年辩诉交易过程中的律师实务。
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;45(2):112-123. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000439.
3
Holistic representation in juvenile defense: An evaluation of a multidisciplinary children's defense team.少年辩护中的整体表现:对多学科儿童辩护团队的评估。
Behav Sci Law. 2021 Feb;39(1):65-82. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2500. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond.累积劣势:一种理解无罪如何导致认罪、错误定罪以及更深远影响的心理学框架。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):353-383. doi: 10.1177/1745691619896608. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Guilty pleas of youths and adults: Differences in legal knowledge and decision making.青少年和成年人的认罪态度:法律知识和决策的差异。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Apr;43(2):166-179. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000314. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.认罪与否:青少年与成年人真实认罪和虚假认罪决定的比较。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Dec;40(6):611-625. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000205. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
7
Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.青少年和成人认罪表格的内容与可理解性:对明知、明智且自愿认罪的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Apr;39(2):162-76. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000118. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
8
Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders.严重青少年罪犯的审讯、供述与认罪
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Apr;38(2):181-93. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000065. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence.青少年时期情绪反应、调节和拒绝敏感性的年龄相关差异。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1235-47. doi: 10.1037/a0028297. Epub 2012 May 28.
10
Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.警察诱导的口供:风险因素与建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):3-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6. Epub 2009 Jul 15.