Rustom David H, Yan Arthur, Seidel Geoffrey K
Pain Management, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e69993. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69993. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar neuroforaminal stenosis (LNS) are common diagnoses that plague patients with low back pain. Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) can be used as an adjunct to investigate lower extremity radicular nerve pain and/or neurogenic claudication. However, there are only limited studies discussing the association of these diagnostic tools with radiculopathy. We investigate the association between EDX-confirmed radiculopathy and the degree of LSS and LNS found on MRI.
A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to an outpatient pain medicine clinic who had a documented EDX and lumbar MRI. We used a Pearson chi-square test to compare the severity of radiographic LSS/LNS with EDX data. The data were fit to a multivariable logistic regression model.
There were not any statistically significant correlations when comparing EDX evidence of radiculopathy and LSS (p = 0.50), LSS severity (p = 0.54), LNS (p = 0.69), or LNS severity (p = 0.11).
We found no significant associations between LSS/LNS severity and EDX findings. The presence and degree of severity of LSS/LNS on MRI were not reliable predictors of EDX findings.
腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)和腰椎神经孔狭窄症(LNS)是困扰腰痛患者的常见诊断。电诊断测试(EDX)可作为辅助手段来研究下肢神经根性神经痛和/或神经源性间歇性跛行。然而,仅有有限的研究讨论了这些诊断工具与神经根病之间的关联。我们研究了经EDX证实的神经根病与MRI上发现的LSS和LNS程度之间的关联。
对到门诊疼痛医学诊所就诊且有记录的EDX和腰椎MRI检查结果的患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们使用Pearson卡方检验来比较影像学上LSS/LNS的严重程度与EDX数据。数据拟合到多变量逻辑回归模型。
在比较神经根病的EDX证据与LSS(p = 0.50)、LSS严重程度(p = 0.54)、LNS(p = 0.69)或LNS严重程度(p = 0.11)时,未发现任何具有统计学意义的相关性。
我们发现LSS/LNS严重程度与EDX结果之间无显著关联。MRI上LSS/LNS的存在及严重程度不是EDX结果的可靠预测指标。