• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为青少年和青年设计积极健康对话工具:混合方法研究。

Designing a Positive Health Dialogue Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Institute for Positive Health, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Public Health Service Brabant Zuid-Oost, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70042. doi: 10.1111/hex.70042.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70042
PMID:39445840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500205/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Being able to express and address strengths and needs related to health is an important asset to enhance resilience during emerging adulthood. Towards this end, we aimed to develop a specific version of the My Positive Health (MPH) dialogue tool for this developmental period (ages 16-25). By adopting a broad perspective on health and striving for applicability in various settings, this tool ultimately seeks to promote integrated collaboration across various domains (healthcare, social care, school).

METHODS

The tool was co-designed with end users, using mixed methods: a descriptive cross-sectional survey questionnaire (N = 118) followed by qualitative focus groups and interview sessions (N = 36). Participants were Dutch citizens (mean age 21.6; 79% female) who were stratified by educational level and chronic disease status (yes/no). The final selection of the content of the tool was made during expert sessions.

RESULTS

A preference appeared for the following dimensions to be part of the dialogue tool: My body, My feelings and thoughts, Meaningfulness, Quality of life, Participation and Daily life. Each dimension was operationalised by aspects (43 in total) to facilitate reflection and dialogue. The following new aspects that are typical for emerging adulthood were formulated and included in the dialogue tool: 'Confidence in yourself', 'Being in control', 'Having confidence in the future', 'Self-expression', 'Meaningful relationships', 'Being able to work or study' and 'Ability to plan'. Other aspects derived from the adult and children's versions of the MPH dialogue tool.

CONCLUSION

A dialogue tool was designed for individuals aged 16-25 in various health- and vulnerability-related conditions and with applicability in various domains.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The development of the dialogue tool was specifically driven by the needs expressed by the users themselves. Planned public and patient contribution comprised consultation and collaboration in (i) design, (ii) recruitment, (iii) focus group sessions, (iv) analysis and discussion of the data and (v) dissemination.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

目的

能够表达和处理与健康相关的优势和需求,是增强成年早期韧性的重要资产。为此,我们旨在为这一发展阶段(16-25 岁)开发一种特定版本的 My Positive Health(MPH)对话工具。通过采用广泛的健康视角,并努力在各种环境中具有适用性,该工具最终旨在促进医疗、社会关怀、学校等各个领域的综合协作。

方法

该工具是与最终用户共同设计的,采用混合方法:一项描述性的横断面调查问卷调查(N=118),随后进行定性焦点小组和访谈(N=36)。参与者为荷兰公民(平均年龄 21.6 岁;79%为女性),按教育程度和慢性病状况(是/否)分层。工具内容的最终选择是在专家会议上进行的。

结果

对于要纳入对话工具的以下维度,似乎存在偏好:我的身体、我的感受和想法、意义、生活质量、参与和日常生活。每个维度都通过 43 个方面进行了操作,以促进反思和对话。还制定并纳入了对话工具中的以下新兴成年期特有的新方面:“对自己有信心”、“能够掌控”、“对未来有信心”、“自我表达”、“有意义的人际关系”、“能够工作或学习”和“有能力计划”。其他方面源自 MPH 对话工具的成人和儿童版本。

结论

为各种健康和脆弱性相关条件下的 16-25 岁个体设计了一种对话工具,并具有在各种领域的适用性。

患者或公众贡献

对话工具的开发特别受到用户自身表达的需求的驱动。计划的公众和患者贡献包括在(i)设计、(ii)招募、(iii)焦点小组会议、(iv)数据分析和讨论以及(v)传播方面进行协商和合作。

试验注册

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/11500205/9b83cb9919b1/HEX-27-e70042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/11500205/579f6326c2b3/HEX-27-e70042-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/11500205/9b83cb9919b1/HEX-27-e70042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/11500205/579f6326c2b3/HEX-27-e70042-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdd3/11500205/9b83cb9919b1/HEX-27-e70042-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing a Positive Health Dialogue Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Study.为青少年和青年设计积极健康对话工具:混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70042. doi: 10.1111/hex.70042.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Development of the My Positive Health dialogue tool for children: a qualitative study on children's views of health.开发儿童积极健康对话工具:一项关于儿童健康观的定性研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Apr;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001373.
4
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
5
Development and psychometric evaluation of a Positive Health measurement scale: a factor analysis study based on a Dutch population.积极健康测量量表的开发与心理计量学评估:基于荷兰人群的因子分析研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e040816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040816.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Study-related demands, resources and curriculum from students' perspective: results of a qualitative descriptive study among students in nursing and healthcare in Germany.从学生视角看与学习相关的要求、资源及课程设置:德国护理与医疗保健专业学生定性描述性研究结果
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 11;24(1):1054. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03692-8.
2
Designing a Positive Health Dialogue Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Study.为青少年和青年设计积极健康对话工具:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70158. doi: 10.1111/hex.70158.
3
Patient Engagement in Integrated Care: What Matters and Why?

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Review on the Concept of Positive Health and Its Implementation in Practice.关于积极健康概念及其在实践中的实施的快速综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;12(6):671. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060671.
2
Development of the My Positive Health dialogue tool for children: a qualitative study on children's views of health.开发儿童积极健康对话工具:一项关于儿童健康观的定性研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Apr;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001373.
3
Participatory research in health promotion: a critical review and illustration of rationales.
患者参与综合医疗服务:重要因素及原因
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70146. doi: 10.1111/hex.70146.
参与式健康促进研究:批判性回顾与理性阐释
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 23;37(Supplement_2):ii7-ii20. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac016.
4
HealthyLIFE, a Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Overweight and Obese Adults: A Descriptive Case Series Study.健康生活,一种针对超重和肥胖成年人的综合生活方式干预:描述性病例系列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11861. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211861.
5
Positive Health dialogue tool and value-based healthcare: a qualitative exploratory study during residents' outpatient consultations.积极健康对话工具与基于价值的医疗保健:在住院医师门诊咨询期间的定性探索性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 24;11(11):e052688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052688.
6
Positive Health and the happy professional: a qualitative case study.积极健康与快乐的专业人士:一项定性案例研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 24;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01509-6.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of a Positive Health measurement scale: a factor analysis study based on a Dutch population.积极健康测量量表的开发与心理计量学评估:基于荷兰人群的因子分析研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e040816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040816.
8
Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit.评估表明,利益相关者重视实施儿科预先护理计划工具包所提供的支持。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Jan;110(1):237-246. doi: 10.1111/apa.15370. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Exploring a transition in Dutch healthcare.探索荷兰医疗保健领域的转型。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Oct 8;32(7):875-890. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2018-0185. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
Coach to cope: feasibility of a life coaching program for young adults with cystic fibrosis.应对指导:针对患有囊性纤维化的年轻人开展生活指导项目的可行性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 21;11:1613-1623. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S141267. eCollection 2017.