Suppr超能文献

三级医疗中心急性胆囊炎的管理:我们是否遵循了现行指南?

Acute cholecystitis management at a tertiary care center: are we following current guidelines?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St 10 Eaton North, Room 216, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.

Department of General Surgery, Department of Vascular Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Oct 24;409(1):323. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

After the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG2018) were published, evidence from the 2018 CHOCOLATE RCT supported early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), even in high-risk patients. This study aims to investigate AC management at our tertiary care center in the years following these publications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients admitted from 2018 to 2023. AC severity was graded using TG2018 definitions. Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty using the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5mFI). Compliance with TG2018 recommendations for management strategy was investigated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery versus non-operative management (NOM). Subset analysis based on patients' age, frailty, and comorbidities was performed.

RESULTS

Among 642 AC patients, 57% underwent cholecystectomy and 43% NOM (22% percutaneous cholecystostomy, 21% antibiotics only). NOM patients had greater length of stay (LOS), complications, deaths, readmissions, and discharge to nursing/rehab versus surgery patients. In 70% of patients managed non-operatively, TG2018 were not followed. Patients managed non-operatively despite TG2018 were more likely to undergo delayed cholecystectomy compared to those in whom guidelines were followed (17% vs. 4%). In subset analysis, healthy octogenarians were significantly less likely to be managed according to TG2018 (9.4%); patients undergoing surgery had a trend towards shorter LOS (3.1 vs. 4.8 days) than those managed non-operatively but no difference in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Most patients undergoing NOM could potentially undergo cholecystectomy if guidelines are considered. A more objective approach to risk assessment may optimize patient selection and outcomes.

摘要

目的

东京 2018 指南(TG2018)发布后,2018 年 CHOCOLATE RCT 的证据支持对急性胆囊炎(AC)进行早期胆囊切除术,即使是高危患者。本研究旨在调查这些出版物发布后我们的三级护理中心对 AC 的管理情况。

方法

对 2018 年至 2023 年期间入院的患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用 TG2018 定义对 AC 严重程度进行分级。使用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)和 5 项简化虚弱指数(5mFI)对合并症进行总结。调查管理策略是否符合 TG2018 建议。比较手术与非手术治疗(NOM)患者的结果。根据患者的年龄、虚弱和合并症进行亚组分析。

结果

在 642 例 AC 患者中,57%接受了胆囊切除术,43%接受了 NOM(22%经皮胆囊造口术,21%仅用抗生素)。NOM 患者的住院时间(LOS)、并发症、死亡、再入院和出院到护理/康复病房的比例均高于手术患者。在 70%接受非手术治疗的患者中,未遵循 TG2018。与遵循指南的患者相比,未接受非手术治疗但遵循指南的患者更有可能接受延迟胆囊切除术(17%比 4%)。在亚组分析中,健康的 80 岁以上老人明显不太可能根据 TG2018 进行治疗(9.4%);与接受非手术治疗的患者相比,接受手术治疗的患者 LOS 更短(3.1 天比 4.8 天),但其他结果没有差异。

结论

如果考虑到指南,大多数接受 NOM 治疗的患者可能会接受胆囊切除术。更客观的风险评估方法可能会优化患者选择和结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验