Hifny Mahmoud A, Abdelmegeed Ahmed Gaber
Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Qena University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Burns. 2024 Dec;50(9):107246. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.08.012. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
While there is no consensus on the best surgical procedure for post-burn axillary contractures, it is crucial to consider the elongation rate along the scar axis as a useful measurement index for determining the optimal surgical approach. The square flap and five flap z-plasty techniques are commonly employed scar lengthening procedures to address scar contractures in the axilla. These approaches successfully disrupt the linear scar, leading to significant elongation while reducing transverse tension. Our study aims to compare the increase in band length and functional results of these two approaches for treating post-burn contractures in the axilla.
A retrospective study was carried out utilizing data from 34 patients with mild-to-moderate band-like contractures located on the anterior or posterior axillary lines who underwent surgical correction through either the square flap method or five-flap z-plasty technique. The effectiveness of surgical methods was evaluated using two objective indices: improvement in contracture band length and improvement in abduction angle at the shoulder joint.
All patients achieved complete contracture release. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the improvement in the degree of abduction postoperatively. Although there was a significant increase in the length of the contracture band postoperatively in both groups, the average increase in length for cases treated with a square flap was significantly greater than those managed with a five-flap Z-plasty (87.7 ± 44.8 % vs. 38.80 ± 11.119 %,) respectively.
The square flap technique is considered a better alternative to the commonly used 5-flap Z-plasty method because it can achieve higher elongation in the contracture band, restore joint function, and create optimal shape when dealing with single linear band contractures over the axilla.
虽然对于烧伤后腋窝挛缩的最佳手术方法尚无共识,但将瘢痕轴线上的延长率作为确定最佳手术方法的有用测量指标至关重要。方形皮瓣和五瓣Z成形术是常用的瘢痕延长手术,用于解决腋窝的瘢痕挛缩。这些方法成功地破坏了线性瘢痕,在减少横向张力的同时实现了显著延长。我们的研究旨在比较这两种方法治疗烧伤后腋窝挛缩时瘢痕带长度的增加和功能结果。
进行了一项回顾性研究,利用34例位于腋窝前后线的轻至中度带状挛缩患者的数据,这些患者通过方形皮瓣法或五瓣Z成形术进行了手术矫正。使用两个客观指标评估手术方法的有效性:挛缩带长度的改善和肩关节外展角度的改善。
所有患者均实现了挛缩完全松解。两组术后外展程度的改善无统计学显著差异。虽然两组术后挛缩带长度均显著增加,但方形皮瓣治疗病例的平均长度增加显著大于五瓣Z成形术治疗的病例(分别为87.7±44.8%和38.80±11.119%)。
方形皮瓣技术被认为是常用的五瓣Z成形术更好的替代方法,因为在处理腋窝单一线性带状挛缩时,它可以使挛缩带获得更高的延长率,恢复关节功能,并创造出最佳外形。