Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 217 Akersten Street, Port Nelson, Nelson 7010, New Zealand.
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 217 Akersten Street, Port Nelson, Nelson 7010, New Zealand.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 10;955:177066. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177066. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
The decline in coastal shellfish populations, attributed to anthropogenic stressors such as harvesting via dredging, can deplete the seabed of vital biogenic habitat. This removal of shellfish significantly reduces habitat complexity, biodiversity, and the hard substrate required for the natural recovery of some key species. A common method for oyster restoration involves deploying oyster shell material to provide habitat and substrate for settling larval oysters. In contrast, hard substrate is not required for the mussel lifecycle and as a result the deployment of mussel shell for seabed restoration has received minimal attention, with the effects of reintroducing this material poorly understood. Deploying mussel shell material has the potential to aid in ecosystem recovery, including reviving seabed biodiversity, especially in areas that have been depleted of shellfish via damaging methods such as dredging. This study aimed to investigate the ecosystem effects of returning mussel shells onto two locations with differing soft sediment (sand and mud) in areas historically subjected to excessive dredging of mussel populations and sedimentation. Within 2 years 4 months the infaunal taxa richness was higher in the shell areas compared to the reference areas in both locations, while abundance of infauna was higher in only the sand location and infaunal diversity did not differ at either location. Epifaunal diversity was also higher in the shell area compared to the reference areas at both locations, while the abundance and richness did not differ. Few significant differences were seen in benthic biogeochemical variables between the reference and shell areas and those observed were likely the result of the addition of the shell material changing the sediment composition. These findings demonstrate that mussel shells are a restoration tool that can enhance epifaunal biodiversity and infaunal taxa richness in soft sediment ecosystems historically impacted by shellfish overharvesting and sedimentation.
沿海贝类种群的减少归因于人类活动的压力,如通过挖泥进行捕捞,这可能会使海底的重要生物栖息地枯竭。贝类的这种移除显著降低了栖息地的复杂性、生物多样性以及一些关键物种自然恢复所需的硬底质。牡蛎修复的常用方法包括部署牡蛎壳材料,为幼虫牡蛎提供栖息地和底质。相比之下,硬底质不是贻贝生命周期所必需的,因此,对于贻贝壳在海底修复中的应用关注甚少,对重新引入这种材料的效果也了解甚少。部署贻贝壳材料有可能有助于生态系统的恢复,包括恢复海底生物多样性,特别是在那些通过破坏性方法(如挖泥)耗尽贝类资源的地区。本研究旨在调查在历史上过度捕捞贻贝和沉积的地区,将贻贝壳放回两个具有不同软质沉积物(沙和泥)的地点的生态系统效应。在 24 个月内,两个地点的壳区的底栖无脊椎动物分类丰富度均高于对照区,而仅在沙区的底栖无脊椎动物丰度较高,且在两个地点的底栖无脊椎动物多样性均无差异。与对照区相比,两个地点的壳区的附着生物多样性也更高,而附着生物的丰度和丰富度则没有差异。在对照区和壳区之间,底栖生物地球化学变量很少有显著差异,而观察到的差异可能是由于添加壳材料改变了沉积物组成的结果。这些发现表明,贻贝壳是一种恢复工具,可以在历史上受到贝类过度捕捞和沉积影响的软质沉积物生态系统中,提高附着生物多样性和底栖无脊椎动物分类丰富度。