Department of Electronic Engineering, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Undergraduate Program of Vehicle and Energy Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Prog Brain Res. 2024;290:123-139. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
This study delves into the application of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs), focusing on exploiting Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) as communication tools for individuals facing mobility impairments. SSVEP-BCI systems can swiftly transmit substantial volumes of information, rendering them suitable for diverse applications. However, the efficacy of SSVEP responses can be influenced by variables such as the frequency and color of visual stimuli. Through experiments involving participants equipped with electrodes on the brain's visual cortex, visual stimuli were administered at 4, 17, 25, and 40Hz, using white, red, yellow, green, and blue light sources. The results reveal that white and green stimuli evoke higher SSVEP responses at lower frequencies, with color's impact diminishing at higher frequencies. At low light intensity (1W), white and green stimuli elicit significantly higher SSVEP responses, while at high intensity (3W), responses across colors tend to equalize. Notably, due to seizure risks, red and blue lights should be used cautiously, with white and green lights preferred for SSVEP-BCI systems. This underscores the critical consideration of color and frequency in the design of effective and safe SSVEP-BCI systems, necessitating further research to optimize designs for clinical applications.
这项研究深入探讨了脑机接口(BCI)的应用,重点研究了利用稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)作为行动不便个体的交流工具。SSVEP-BCI 系统能够快速传输大量信息,适用于多种应用。然而,SSVEP 响应的效果可能会受到视觉刺激的频率和颜色等因素的影响。通过对大脑视觉皮层带有电极的参与者进行实验,使用白色、红色、黄色、绿色和蓝色光源,以 4、17、25 和 40Hz 的频率施加视觉刺激。结果表明,白色和绿色刺激在较低频率下会引起更高的 SSVEP 响应,而颜色的影响在较高频率下会减弱。在低光强度(1W)下,白色和绿色刺激会引起明显更高的 SSVEP 响应,而在高光强度(3W)下,各种颜色的响应趋于均衡。值得注意的是,由于癫痫发作的风险,红色和蓝色光应谨慎使用,而白色和绿色光更适合 SSVEP-BCI 系统。这凸显了在设计有效和安全的 SSVEP-BCI 系统时,颜色和频率的重要性,需要进一步研究以优化设计,使其适用于临床应用。