Sterke F, van Weteringen W, van der Zee P A, van Rosmalen J, Wijnen R M H, Vlot J
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO box 2040, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7426-7434. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11338-0. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Establishing a pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopy is common surgical practice, with the goal to create an optimal surgical workspace within the abdominal cavity while minimizing insufflation pressure. Individualized strategies, based on neuromuscular blockade (NMB), pre-stretching routines, and personalized intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) to enhance surgical conditions are strategies to improve surgical workspace. However, the specific impact of each factor remains uncertain. This study explores the effects and side-effects of modifying intra-abdominal volume (IAV) through moderate and complete NMB in a porcine laparoscopy model.
Thirty female Landrace pigs were randomly assigned to groups with complete NMB, regular NMB and a control group. Varying IAP levels were applied, and IAV was measured using CT scans. The study evaluated the maximum attainable IAV (V), the pressure at which the cavity opens (p), and the ease of expansion (λ). Cardiorespiratory parameters, including peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), were continuously recorded to evaluate side-effects.
There were no significant weight differences between NMB groups (median 21.1 kg). Observed volumes ranged from 0 to 4.7 L, with a mean V of 3.82 L, mean p of 1.23 mmHg, and mean λ of 0.13 hPa. NMB depth did not significantly affect these parameters. HR was significantly increased in the complete NMB group, while PIP, MAP, and CO remained unaffected. Repeated insufflation positively impacted V; ease of opening; and expanding the cavity.
In this porcine model, the depth of NMB does not alter abdominal mechanics or increase the surgical workspace. Cardiorespiratory changes are more related to insufflation pressure and frequency rather than NMB depth. Future studies should compensate for the positive effect of repeated insufflation on abdominal mechanics and surgical conditions.
建立气腹进行腹腔镜手术是常见的外科操作,目的是在腹腔内创建一个最佳的手术操作空间,同时将气腹压力降至最低。基于神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)、预拉伸程序和个性化腹内压(IAP)以改善手术条件的个体化策略是改善手术操作空间的方法。然而,每个因素的具体影响仍不确定。本研究在猪腹腔镜模型中探讨通过中度和完全NMB改变腹腔容积(IAV)的效果和副作用。
30只雌性长白猪被随机分为完全NMB组、常规NMB组和对照组。应用不同的IAP水平,并使用CT扫描测量IAV。该研究评估了可达到的最大IAV(V)、腹腔开放时的压力(p)和扩张的难易程度(λ)。持续记录包括吸气峰压(PIP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和心输出量(CO)在内的心肺参数,以评估副作用。
NMB组之间体重无显著差异(中位数21.1千克)。观察到的容积范围为0至4.7升,平均V为3.82升,平均p为1.23毫米汞柱,平均λ为0.13百帕。NMB深度对这些参数无显著影响。完全NMB组的HR显著增加,而PIP、MAP和CO不受影响。重复充气对V、开放的难易程度和扩大腹腔有积极影响。
在该猪模型中,NMB深度不会改变腹部力学或增加手术操作空间。心肺变化与充气压力和频率的关系更大,而非NMB深度。未来的研究应弥补重复充气对腹部力学和手术条件的积极影响。