• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索性证据图谱为第五版世界卫生组织肿瘤分类的肺和胸腺肿瘤。

Exploratory evidence maps for the WHO Classification of Tumours 5th edition for lung and thymus tumors.

机构信息

Evidence Synthesis Branch, International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, CEDEX 07, LYON, France.

Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIII, Calle de Melchor Fernández Almagro 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2024 Nov;485(5):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03886-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00428-024-03886-6
PMID:39448408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11564295/
Abstract

The WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT) guides cancer diagnosis, treatment, and research. However, research evidence in pathology continuously changes, and new evidence emerges. Correct assessment of evidence in the WCT 5th edition (WCT-5) and identification of high level of evidence (LOE) studies based on study design are needed to improve future editions. We aimed at producing exploratory evidence maps for WCT-5 Thoracic Tumours, specifically lung and thymus tumors. We extracted citations from WCT-5, and imported and coded them in EPPI-Reviewer. The maps were plotted using EPPI-Mapper. Maps displayed tumor types (columns), descriptors (rows), and LOE (bubbles using a four-color code). We included 1434 studies addressing 51 lung, and 677 studies addressing 25 thymus tumor types from WCT-5 thoracic tumours volume. Overall, 87.7% (n = 1257) and 80.8% (n = 547) references were low, and 4.1% (n = 59) and 2.2% (n = 15) high LOE for lung and thymus tumors, respectively. Invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 215; 15.0%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus (n = 93; 13.7%) presented the highest number of references. High LOE was observed for colloid adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 11; 18.2%) and type AB thymoma (n = 4; 1.4%). Tumor descriptors with the highest number of citations were prognosis and prediction (n = 273; 19.0%) for lung, and epidemiology (n = 186; 28.0%) for thymus tumors. LOE was generally low for lung and thymus tumors. This study represents an initial step in the WCT Evidence Gap Map (WCT-EVI-MAP) project for mapping references in WCT-5 for all tumor types to inform future WCT editions.

摘要

世界卫生组织肿瘤分类(WCT)指导癌症的诊断、治疗和研究。然而,病理学研究证据不断变化,新证据不断涌现。为了改进未来的版本,需要对第五版 WCT(WCT-5)中的证据进行正确评估,并根据研究设计确定高水平证据(LOE)研究。我们旨在为 WCT-5 胸部肿瘤,特别是肺和胸腺肿瘤制作探索性证据图谱。我们从 WCT-5 中提取引文,并将其导入和编码在 EPPI-Reviewer 中。使用 EPPI-Mapper 绘制图谱。图谱显示肿瘤类型(列)、描述符(行)和 LOE(使用四色代码的气泡)。我们纳入了来自 WCT-5 胸部肿瘤卷的 51 种肺肿瘤和 677 种胸腺肿瘤类型的 1434 项研究。总体而言,肺和胸腺肿瘤的低水平证据(n=1257;87.7%)和高水平证据(n=547;80.8%)分别占 87.7%(n=1257)和 80.8%(n=547),4.1%(n=59)和 2.2%(n=15)。肺的浸润性非黏液性腺癌(n=215;15.0%)和胸腺癌(n=93;13.7%)的参考文献数量最多。肺的胶样腺癌(n=11;18.2%)和 AB 型胸腺瘤(n=4;1.4%)的高水平证据。肺肿瘤描述符的参考文献数量最多的是预后和预测(n=273;19.0%),而胸腺肿瘤则是流行病学(n=186;28.0%)。肺和胸腺肿瘤的 LOE 普遍较低。这项研究代表了 WCT 证据差距图谱(WCT-EVI-MAP)项目的初步步骤,该项目旨在为所有肿瘤类型在 WCT-5 中的参考文献制作图谱,以为未来的 WCT 版本提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/3ee5301cd199/428_2024_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/26d6a6f81ac6/428_2024_3886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/53cc4868d1d9/428_2024_3886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/e5ff0c19b2d7/428_2024_3886_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/3ee5301cd199/428_2024_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/26d6a6f81ac6/428_2024_3886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/53cc4868d1d9/428_2024_3886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/e5ff0c19b2d7/428_2024_3886_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0a/11564295/3ee5301cd199/428_2024_3886_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploratory evidence maps for the WHO Classification of Tumours 5th edition for lung and thymus tumors.探索性证据图谱为第五版世界卫生组织肿瘤分类的肺和胸腺肿瘤。
Virchows Arch. 2024 Nov;485(5):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03886-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung.理解世卫组织肿瘤分类中证据的应用:对肺癌肿瘤分类的证据差距图的制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e061240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240.
3
Mapping the cited evidence of ductal carcinoma in situ from the 5th edition of the World Health Organisation classification of tumours of the breast.绘制第五版世界卫生组织乳腺肿瘤分类中导管原位癌的引用证据图谱。
Histopathology. 2024 Sep;85(3):510-520. doi: 10.1111/his.15279. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
Phyllodes tumour evidence gaps mapped from the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumours of the breast.叶状肿瘤证据差距从第 5 版世卫组织乳腺肿瘤分类映射。
Histopathology. 2023 Apr;82(5):704-712. doi: 10.1111/his.14856. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Thymus: Continuity and Changes.《2015年世界卫生组织胸腺肿瘤分类:延续性与变化》
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Oct;10(10):1383-95. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000654.
6
Interobserver variation in the classification of thymic tumours--a multicentre study using the WHO classification system.胸腺肿瘤分类中的观察者间差异——一项使用世界卫生组织分类系统的多中心研究。
Histopathology. 2008 Aug;53(2):218-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03088.x.
7
The Impact of the Fourth Edition of the WHO Classification of Lung Tumours on Histological Classification of Resected Pulmonary NSCCs.第四版世界卫生组织肺肿瘤分类对肺神经内分泌癌切除标本组织学分类的影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jun;11(6):862-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma.国际肺癌研究协会/美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会国际多学科肺腺癌分类。
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Feb;6(2):244-85. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221.
9
[Surgical treatment of thymomas in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis].[重症肌无力患者胸腺瘤的外科治疗]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2003(10):15-20.
10
[New WHO classification of lung adenocarcinoma and preneoplasia].[世界卫生组织肺腺癌及癌前病变的新分类]
Ann Pathol. 2016 Jan;36(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Epstein-Barr virus-driven molecular pathogenesis of primary pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma.爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒驱动的原发性肺淋巴上皮癌的分子发病机制
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;15:1630415. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1630415. eCollection 2025.
2
Preoperative multiclass classification of thymic mass lesions based on radiomics and machine learning.基于影像组学和机器学习的胸腺肿块病变术前多类别分类
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00839-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Models for Asian Ever-Smokers.亚洲终身吸烟者肺癌风险预测模型。
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Mar;19(3):451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
A New Hierarchy of Research Evidence for Tumor Pathology: A Delphi Study to Define Levels of Evidence in Tumor Pathology.肿瘤病理学研究证据的新层次:定义肿瘤病理学证据水平的德尔菲研究。
Mod Pathol. 2024 Jan;37(1):100357. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100357. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
Global variations in lung cancer incidence by histological subtype in 2020: a population-based study.
2020 年按组织学亚型划分的全球肺癌发病率变化:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Nov;24(11):1206-1218. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00444-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map.制作坎贝尔证据与差距图的指南。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 19;16(4):e1125. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1125. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different- the "Big Picture" review family.绘制文献综述、范围综述和证据与差距图(EGM):同而不同——“大图景”综述家族。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5.
6
Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung.理解世卫组织肿瘤分类中证据的应用:对肺癌肿瘤分类的证据差距图的制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e061240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240.
7
Evidence-levels in pathology for informing the WHO classification of tumours.用于指导世界卫生组织肿瘤分类的病理学证据级别。
Histopathology. 2022 Oct;81(4):420-425. doi: 10.1111/his.14648.
8
Evolutionary Changes in Pathology and Our Understanding of Disease.病理学的演变和我们对疾病的认识。
Pathobiology. 2023;90(3):209-218. doi: 10.1159/000526024. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
An Approach to Building Equitable Global Health Research Collaborations.构建公平的全球卫生研究合作的方法。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Oct 1;86(1):126. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3039.
10
The International Collaboration for Cancer Classification and Research.国际癌症分类与研究协作组织。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;148(3):560-571. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33260. Epub 2020 Oct 9.