• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别影响超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS-FNB)诊断胰腺肿块准确性的超声内镜特征。

Identification of Endosonographic Features that Compromise EUS-FNB Diagnostic Accuracy in Pancreatic Masses.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng Li Road, Tainan, 704, Taiwan.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4302-4310. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08691-4. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08691-4
PMID:39448514
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is highly accurate for diagnosing pancreatic mass. However, making diagnosis is challenging in 5-20% of patients. This study investigated the challenging features associated with reduced diagnostic performance in EUS-FNB and potential rescue methods that can improve the diagnostic rate.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with solid pancreatic tumors who underwent EUS-FNB between January 1, 2019, and December 12, 2021. Patients without a computed tomography (CT) scan or definite diagnosis were excluded. Challenging features were features that reduced diagnostic accuracy in EUS-FNB, as determined through multivariate analysis. Rescue methods were methods that assisted operators in assessing lesions in patients with challenging features.

RESULTS

Of 332 enrolled patients, an accurate diagnosis obtained using EUS-FNB was achieved in 286 (86.1%). Univariable analysis revealed that the diagnostic accuracy was lower in cases of pancreatic tumors with isoattenuation in CT images (77.3% vs. 89.8%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.39, p = 0.003), an ill-defined margin on EUS (61.2% vs. 92.5%, OR: 0.13, p < 0.001), or tumor size < 20 mm (65.5% vs. 88.1%, OR: 0.26, p = 0.002). However, only ill-defined margins on EUS (OR: 0.14, p < 0.001) and tumor size < 20 mm (OR: 0.25, p = 0.005) were independent predictors of inconclusive EUS-FNB in the multivariate analysis. The use of contrast (OR: 4.46, p = 0.026) and a highly experienced endosonographer (> 5cases/month; OR: 3.25, p = 0.034) improved diagnostic performance in difficult cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic tumors with ill-defined tumor margins on EUS or size < 20 mm are challenging features in EUS-FNB. The use of contrast and a highly experienced endosonographer can improve diagnostic performance in difficult cases.

摘要

背景

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)对于诊断胰腺肿块非常准确。然而,在 5-20%的患者中,做出诊断具有挑战性。本研究调查了与 EUS-FNB 诊断性能降低相关的具有挑战性的特征,以及可能提高诊断率的潜在抢救方法。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 12 日期间接受 EUS-FNB 治疗的实性胰腺肿瘤患者。排除了没有 CT 扫描或明确诊断的患者。通过多变量分析确定,具有挑战性的特征是降低 EUS-FNB 诊断准确性的特征。抢救方法是帮助操作者评估具有挑战性特征的患者病变的方法。

结果

在 332 名入组患者中,通过 EUS-FNB 获得了准确的诊断,286 名(86.1%)患者获得了准确的诊断。单变量分析显示,CT 图像上胰腺肿瘤等密度(77.3% vs. 89.8%,优势比[OR]:0.39,p=0.003)、EUS 上边界不清(61.2% vs. 92.5%,OR:0.13,p<0.001)或肿瘤直径<20mm(65.5% vs. 88.1%,OR:0.26,p=0.002)时,诊断准确性较低。然而,只有 EUS 上边界不清(OR:0.14,p<0.001)和肿瘤直径<20mm(OR:0.25,p=0.005)是多变量分析中 EUS-FNB 不确定结果的独立预测因素。使用对比剂(OR:4.46,p=0.026)和经验丰富的内镜超声医师(>5 例/月;OR:3.25,p=0.034)可提高困难病例的诊断性能。

结论

EUS 上边界不清或直径<20mm 的胰腺肿瘤是 EUS-FNB 的具有挑战性的特征。使用对比剂和经验丰富的内镜超声医师可以提高困难病例的诊断性能。

相似文献

1
Identification of Endosonographic Features that Compromise EUS-FNB Diagnostic Accuracy in Pancreatic Masses.识别影响超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS-FNB)诊断胰腺肿块准确性的超声内镜特征。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4302-4310. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08691-4. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
High Diagnostic Yield of Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Serous Cystadenomas-A Multicenter Study.胰腺浆液性囊腺瘤细针穿刺活检的高诊断率——一项多中心研究
Pancreas. 2025 Apr 1;54(4):e349-e352. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002442.
3
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.内镜超声引导下组织采集(EUS-FNA)与 EUS-FNB 对无 ROSE 的胰腺实性肿块的诊断性能:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 24;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02682-3.
4
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查(EUS-FNA)与内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断价值比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2151-2158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2151.
5
Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles.经食管内镜超声在肺部肿块诊断中的应用:细针抽吸和细针活检针的多中心经验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul 1;34(7):757-762. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002383. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
6
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.内镜超声引导下对实性胰腺病变进行组织采集并联合或不联合快速现场评估:单中心五年经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(10):1185-1193. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204985. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检时进行触摸印片细胞学检查,在评估胰腺实性病变方面,其样本质量和诊断率与标准内镜超声引导下细针抽吸标本相当。
Cytopathology. 2019 Mar;30(2):179-186. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12662. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.内镜超声引导下实性胰腺肿块采样:22号穿刺针抽吸与25号活检针活检的比较
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9.
9
Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.内镜超声联合细针穿刺抽吸及活检可提高实性胰腺肿块的诊断率。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 May;57(5):610-617. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.2024249. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
10
Repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions after previous nondiagnostic or inconclusive sampling.对先前非诊断性或不确定的取样后实性胰腺病变进行重复内镜超声引导下细针活检。
Dig Endosc. 2024 May;36(5):615-624. doi: 10.1111/den.14686. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical value of the nomogram model based on endoscopic ultrasonography radiomics and clinical indicators in identifying benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas.基于内镜超声影像学和临床指标的列线图模型在鉴别胰腺良恶性病变中的临床价值
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 19;15:1504593. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1504593. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center.超声内镜引导下对比增强细针活检是否优于传统细针活检? 一家医疗中心的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6138-6143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09253-3. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Usefulness of Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation Using a Stereomicroscope during EUS-FNB for Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.使用立体显微镜进行 EUS-FNB 时对胰腺实体性病变进行宏观现场评估的作用。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan 18;2022:2737578. doi: 10.1155/2022/2737578. eCollection 2022.
3
Confirming Whether Fine Needle Biopsy Device Shortens the Learning Curve of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Without Rapid Onsite Evaluation.
确认细针穿刺活检装置是否能在无快速现场评估的情况下缩短内镜超声引导下组织获取的学习曲线。
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):420-427. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.184. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Staging in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Personalised Medicine.内镜超声在新辅助治疗和个性化医疗时代胰腺癌分期中的作用
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb;28(2):111-120. doi: 10.1159/000509197. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic and biliary tumors.影响内镜超声引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)诊断胰腺和胆道肿瘤准确性的因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):498-504. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1880628. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Comparison of contrast-enhanced versus conventional EUS-guided FNA/fine-needle biopsy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a randomized controlled trial.对比增强超声内镜引导下 FNA/FNB 与常规超声内镜引导下 FNA/FNB 对胰腺实性病变诊断价值的随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug;94(2):303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
7
EUS tissue acquisition: From A to B.超声内镜组织获取:从A到B
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Jul-Aug;9(4):225-231. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_20.
8
Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis.超声内镜引导下穿刺活检与细针抽吸活检装置用于实体病灶取样的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):411-423. doi: 10.1055/a-1206-5552. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术与细针活检的评估及快速现场评估对胰腺肿块的影响
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E738-E747. doi: 10.1055/a-1122-8674. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
22G Acquire vs. 20G Procore needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of pancreatic masses: a randomized study comparing histologic sample quantity and diagnostic accuracy.22G 与 20G Procore 针用于内镜超声引导下胰腺肿块活检:比较组织学样本数量和诊断准确性的随机研究。
Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):747-753. doi: 10.1055/a-1160-5485. Epub 2020 May 14.