Kovacevic Bojan, Vilmann Peter
Gastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University, Herlev, Denmark.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Jul-Aug;9(4):225-231. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_20.
EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has made rapid development since its introduction in the early 1990s. The technique is widely accepted and invaluable for staging and diagnosis of a variety of upper gastrointestinal and mediastinal lesions. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has long been the gold standard, but due to its limitations such as the inability to retain stroma and associated cellular architecture, novel biopsy needles (FNB) were designed. Overall, FNA and FNB needles perform seemingly equally in terms of diagnostic accuracy, however, the second-generation FNB needles require less passes. The third-generation FNB needles (crown-cut needle types) seem to be preferable to FNA needles as well as to the second-generation FNB needles, when larger histological specimens and preserved tissue architecture are required. EUS-TA is constantly under development, and new applications of this technique include tumor risk stratification according to its genetic profile as well as minimally invasive creation of patient-derived organoids, hallmarks of personized medicine. It remains yet to be shown, whether these applications will lead to a decisive shift from aspiration to biopsy, i.e., from A to B.
自20世纪90年代初引入以来,超声内镜引导下组织获取术(EUS-TA)发展迅速。该技术被广泛接受,对于各种上消化道和纵隔病变的分期及诊断具有重要价值。细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)长期以来一直是金标准,但由于其存在如无法保留间质和相关细胞结构等局限性,新型活检针(FNB)应运而生。总体而言,FNA针和FNB针在诊断准确性方面表现相当,但第二代FNB针所需穿刺次数更少。当需要更大的组织学标本和保留的组织结构时,第三代FNB针(冠切针类型)似乎比FNA针以及第二代FNB针更具优势。EUS-TA仍在不断发展,该技术的新应用包括根据肿瘤基因谱进行肿瘤风险分层以及微创创建患者来源的类器官,这些都是个性化医疗的标志。这些应用是否会导致从抽吸到活检的决定性转变,即从A到B,仍有待观察。