• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响伴有创伤性中央索综合征的颈椎病脊髓病的危险因素和不同治疗方案的疗效。

Risk factors affecting cervical spondylotic myelopathy complicated with traumatic central cord syndrome and the efficacy of different treatment options.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, First People's Hospital of Xianyang, No. 10, Biyuan Road, Qindu District, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712099, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07918-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07918-9
PMID:39448985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515412/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the influencing factors and treatment options of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) complicated with traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS).

METHODS

A total of 243 patients with CSM admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and then divided into the control group (n = 152) and the observation group (n = 91) according to the presence or absence of concurrent TCCS. The clinical data and imaging data of the two groups were compared, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of CSM complicated with TCCS. Patients in the observation group were further divided into the zero notch anterior cervical interbody fusion device (Zero-P) group (n = 45) and the cervical spine locking plate (CSLP) group (n = 46) according to the treatment mode, and the perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared. The treatment effects were evaluated by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) before surgery, 1 week after surgery and 6 months after surgery. The height of intervertebral space and the cervical lordosis angle were measured.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the injury mechanism (hyperextension injury), hand muscle weakness, cervical instability, age, degree of cervical spinal stenosis, degree of cervical spinal cord compression, and changes in intramedullary high signal were the risk factors, while the type of compression (soft), ASIA score and JOA score were the protective factor for CSM complicated with TCCS (P < 0.05). Patients in Zero-P group had much shorter operation time and hospitalization time than these in CSLP group (P < 0.05). The cervical lordosis angle and intervertebral space height at 1 week and 6 months after operation in the two groups were both largely higher than these before operation, and the cervical lordosis angle and intervertebral space height in the Zero-P group were significantly higher than these in the CSLP group one week after surgery (P < 0.05). The ASIA score and JOA score were obviously increased in the two groups 1 week and 6 months after surgery, and the ASIA score and JOA score in the Zero-P group were significantly higher than these in the CSLP group at 1 week after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mechanism of TCCS in CSM is still controversial, which it is generally believed to be caused by cervical hyperextension injury. The clinical symptoms are diverse, and the treatment methods are also different. This study shows that the mechanism of injury, type of compression, hand muscle weakness, cervical instability, age, cervical stenosis compression, and intramedullary high signal changes are all risk factors for CSM complicated with TCCS. Early identification of risk factors and targeted interventions can effectively reduce the complicated rate of TCCS. Zero-P and CSLP surgical fixation have good efficacy in the treatment of TCCS, and there is little difference in efficacy between the two. However, Zero-P fixation surgery has the advantages of short operation time and fast postoperative recovery.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/11515412/c5ad0ffa0c80/12891_2024_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/11515412/65841aa857cd/12891_2024_7918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/11515412/c5ad0ffa0c80/12891_2024_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/11515412/65841aa857cd/12891_2024_7918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/11515412/c5ad0ffa0c80/12891_2024_7918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

目的

分析颈椎脊髓病(CSM)并发创伤性中央脊髓综合征(TCCS)的影响因素及治疗选择。

方法

回顾性分析 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月我院收治的 243 例 CSM 患者,根据是否合并并发 TCCS 将患者分为对照组(n=152)和观察组(n=91)。比较两组患者的临床资料和影像学资料,采用多因素 logistic 回归分析 CSM 并发 TCCS 的影响因素。观察组患者根据治疗方式进一步分为零切迹颈椎前路椎间融合器(Zero-P)组(n=45)和颈椎锁定钢板(CSLP)组(n=46),比较两组患者的围手术期指标。分别于术前、术后 1 周及术后 6 个月采用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)和日本矫形协会(JOA)评分评估治疗效果。测量椎间间隙高度和颈椎曲度角。

结果

多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,损伤机制(过伸损伤)、手部肌肉无力、颈椎不稳、年龄、颈椎管狭窄程度、颈椎脊髓压迫程度、髓内高信号改变是 CSM 并发 TCCS 的危险因素,而压迫类型(软性)、ASIA 评分和 JOA 评分是其保护因素(P<0.05)。Zero-P 组患者的手术时间和住院时间明显短于 CSLP 组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后 1 周和 6 个月的颈椎曲度角和椎间间隙高度均明显高于术前,且 Zero-P 组术后 1 周的颈椎曲度角和椎间间隙高度明显高于 CSLP 组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后 1 周和 6 个月的 ASIA 评分和 JOA 评分均明显升高,且 Zero-P 组术后 1 周的 ASIA 评分和 JOA 评分明显高于 CSLP 组(P<0.05)。

结论

CSM 并发 TCCS 的发病机制仍存在争议,一般认为是由颈椎过伸损伤引起。临床表现多样,治疗方法也不同。本研究表明,损伤机制、压迫类型、手部肌肉无力、颈椎不稳、年龄、颈椎管狭窄压迫、髓内高信号改变均为 CSM 并发 TCCS 的危险因素。早期识别危险因素并针对性干预可有效降低 TCCS 的并发率。Zero-P 和 CSLP 手术固定治疗 TCCS 的疗效较好,两者疗效差异无统计学意义。但 Zero-P 固定术操作时间短,术后恢复快。

相似文献

1
Risk factors affecting cervical spondylotic myelopathy complicated with traumatic central cord syndrome and the efficacy of different treatment options.影响伴有创伤性中央索综合征的颈椎病脊髓病的危险因素和不同治疗方案的疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07918-9.
2
[Analysis of imaging characteristics and effectiveness of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis].[伴颈椎后凸的脊髓型颈椎病的影像学特征及疗效分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):542-549. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402018.
3
[A comparative study between on-endcaps and non-endcaps titanium mesh cage for the treatment of elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy complicated with osteoporosis approach for anterior cervical spine surgery].[用于治疗合并骨质疏松的老年脊髓型颈椎病的端帽式与非端帽式钛网笼对比研究:颈椎前路手术入路]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):5-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.01.002.
4
A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.前路减压融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗脊髓前方大压迫型脊髓型颈椎病的对比研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1137-E1142. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000500.
5
The relationship between preoperative factors and the presence of intramedullary increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.脊髓型颈椎病患者术前因素与T2加权磁共振成像上髓内信号强度增加之间的关系。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;178:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
[Comparison of clinical effects between anterior cervical Zero-incision fusion system and traditional nail plate system in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].颈椎前路零切融合系统与传统钉板系统治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 May 25;30(5):411-416. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.05.005.
7
[Clinical study on spinal cord decompression combined with traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].脊髓减压联合中药治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):30-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.01.006.
8
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: A three-year follow-up.零切迹椎间融合器与带钢板固定的椎间融合器治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较分析:三年随访
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 May;144:72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
[Comparison of clinical effects of two anterior cervical decompression with fusion on treating two segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy].两种颈椎前路减压融合术治疗两节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Sep 25;33(9):841-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.09.010.
10
The efficacy and safety of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.微型开放(空气/水介质)内镜辅助下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效与安全性。
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2243-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06212-6. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a score-based approach based on the literature.基于文献的急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征治疗:评分法。
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07626-3. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Acute Traumatic Myelopathy: Rethinking Central Cord Syndrome.急性创伤性脊髓病:重新思考中央索综合征。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec 1;30(23):1099-1107. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00260.
3
Surgical Efficacy and Prognostic Factors for Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome Without Fracture and Dislocation.
无骨折脱位型急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征的手术疗效及预后因素。
Orthopedics. 2022 Nov-Dec;45(6):325-332. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20220907-07. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
4
Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Acute Traumatic Central Spinal Cord Syndrome with Multilevel Cervical Canal Stenosis without Cervical Fracture or Dislocation.多节段无骨折脱位型颈椎管狭窄伴急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征的前后路手术疗效比较
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Feb 16;2022:5132134. doi: 10.1155/2022/5132134. eCollection 2022.
5
The Relationship Between Preoperative Cervical Sagittal Balance and Clinical Outcome of Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome.术前颈椎矢状平衡与急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征临床疗效的关系。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e468-e474. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.030. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
6
Pros and Cons of Early and Very Early Surgery for Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome with Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review and Case Report.创伤性中央脊髓综合征伴脊柱狭窄的早期和极早期手术的优缺点:文献回顾和病例报告。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;83(1):57-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735858. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
The Central Cord Score: A Novel Classification and Scoring System Specific to Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome.中央脊髓评分:一种针对急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征的新型分类和评分系统。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e235-e242. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
8
Elderly traumatic central cord syndrome in the USA: a review of management and outcomes.美国老年创伤性中央脊髓综合征:治疗与预后的综述。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Aug;65(4):442-449. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05078-5. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
[Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: Etiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestation, and Treatment].[急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征:病因、病理生理学、临床表现及治疗]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2021 Apr;110(6):324-335. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003659.
10
Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.颈椎脊髓病患者接受前路与后路脊柱手术对患者报告的躯体功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):942-951. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1233.