Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06155-x.
BACKGROUND: Critical thinking has been regarded as an essential skill for college students, which is especially imperative for medical students to possess the ability to have in-depth insight into complex clinical situations. Medical Immunology is an overarching principle connecting multiple medical subjects, which emphasizes that immunity is both beneficial and harmful to the host, thus putting higher demands on students' critical thinking. The utilization of Nobel Prize stories has been cited as a thematic framework for classroom teaching of other courses, showing numerous educational benefits. Therefore, this study rejuvenated a case-based teaching approach by creating and introducing a vibrant material library centered on numerous iconic Nobel Prize cases in Medical Immunology and evaluating its effects on the critical thinking of medical students. METHODS: A total of 70 second-year medical undergraduates from the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were divided into a control group and an experimental group of 35 cases each. Throughout the semester, the control received the traditional teaching method, and the experimental group adopted case-based teaching based on the Nobel prize-centered material library. The process of teaching design and practice was described using "Antitoxin and immunoserum therapy" as a classical example. A unified assessment of the critical thinking dispositions of participants was conducted at the beginning and end of the semester using the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV). RESULTS: Intra-group longitudinal comparisons and inter-group parallel evaluations indicated that, compared with the conventional teaching approach, Nobel Prize case-based learning induced a statistically significant increase in the overall score of the CTDI-CV, as well as the scores within the subdimensions of truth-seeking, analyticity, and maturity in judgment (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis further indicated a positive correlation between the total score of the CTDI-CV and the final grade (p < 0.05), which emphasized the crucial role of critical thinking dispositions in academic achievement. CONCLUSION: The case-based classroom teaching centered on Nobel Prize cases for Medical Immunology can effectively improve the critical thinking dispositions of medical undergraduates, which contributes to cultivating high-level medical and healthcare talents with excellent comprehensive quality in the new era.
背景:批判性思维被认为是大学生的一项基本技能,对于医学生来说,深入洞察复杂临床情况的能力尤为重要。医学免疫学是连接多个医学学科的总体原则,强调免疫对宿主既有有益的一面,也有有害的一面,因此对学生的批判性思维提出了更高的要求。诺贝尔奖故事的运用已被引用为其他课程课堂教学的主题框架,显示出许多教育益处。因此,本研究通过创建和引入以医学免疫学中众多标志性诺贝尔奖案例为中心的充满活力的素材库,复兴了一种基于案例的教学方法,并评估其对医学生批判性思维的影响。
方法:将北京中医药大学的 70 名二年级医学生分为对照组和实验组,每组 35 人。整个学期,对照组接受传统教学方法,实验组采用基于诺贝尔奖为中心的素材库的基于案例的教学方法。教学设计和实践过程以“抗毒素和免疫血清疗法”为例进行了描述。在学期开始和结束时,使用中文版批判性思维倾向量表(CTDI-CV)对参与者的批判性思维倾向进行统一评估。
结果:组内纵向比较和组间平行评价表明,与传统教学方法相比,诺贝尔奖案例学习在 CTDI-CV 的总分以及在求真、分析性和判断力成熟度等子维度的得分上均引起了统计学上的显著增加(p<0.05)。Pearson 相关分析进一步表明,CTDI-CV 的总分与期末成绩呈正相关(p<0.05),这强调了批判性思维倾向在学业成绩中的关键作用。
结论:以诺贝尔案例为中心的医学免疫学课堂教学可以有效提高医学生的批判性思维倾向,有助于培养新时代具有优秀综合素质的高水平医学和医疗保健人才。
BMC Med Educ. 2021-7-16
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024-10-23
BMC Med Educ. 2023-4-12
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021-8
BMC Med Educ. 2021-7-16
Nurse Educ Today. 2018-6-21