• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新获得资格护士在实践中参与质量改进的经历:一项定性随访研究。

Experiences of Newly Qualified Nurses' Engagement with Quality Improvement in Practice: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study.

作者信息

Armstrong Lorraine, Shepherd Ashley, Harris Fiona

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(4):2990-3006. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040218.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep14040218
PMID:39449455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503377/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurse education plays an essential role in preparing future nurses to engage with quality improvement (QI) initiatives in their organisations and improve patient care. However, frontline nurses continue to report that a lack of QI knowledge hinders their abilities to engage in improvement work. In the UK, student nurses are now trained in QI within their degree to enable them to contribute to improvements once qualified.

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative follow-up study investigated the sustainability of QI engagement in nurses who undertook QI training and a QI project during their degree and explored the factors influencing their engagement in QI once qualified.

METHODS

This paper followed the COREQ criteria to report upon 10 semi-structured interviews undertaken with registered nurses and focuses on their experiences of QI engagement post-registration. The data were investigated using an inductive thematic analysis and Nvivo 14.

FINDINGS

Five themes emerged: transition to a newly qualified nurse, QI knowledge decline, influencing factors (hierarchy, leadership, COVID-19 pandemic, data access and location), and skill transferability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that qualified nurses can sustain their QI knowledge and remain engaged with QI where they experience positive QI leadership and were exposed to ongoing QI activity in their preceptorship year. However, a lack of QI opportunities and a culture which does not consider QI a responsibility of new nurses is seen to hinder engagement. Educational institutions and practice partners require careful collaboration to assess and develop ongoing QI learning activities that support new nurses to engage in QI.

摘要

背景

护士教育在培养未来护士参与所在机构的质量改进(QI)举措及改善患者护理方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,一线护士仍不断报告称,缺乏质量改进知识阻碍了他们参与改进工作的能力。在英国,现在学生护士在其学位课程中接受质量改进培训,以使他们一旦获得资格就能为改进工作做出贡献。

目的

这项定性随访研究调查了在学位期间接受质量改进培训并参与质量改进项目的护士中,质量改进参与的可持续性,并探讨了影响他们获得资格后参与质量改进的因素。

方法

本文遵循COREQ标准,报告了对注册护士进行的10次半结构化访谈,并重点关注他们注册后参与质量改进的经历。使用归纳主题分析法和Nvivo 14对数据进行了调查。

结果

出现了五个主题:向新获得资格护士的过渡、质量改进知识的下降、影响因素(层级、领导力、新冠疫情、数据获取和地点)以及技能的可转移性。

结论

本研究表明,在经历积极的质量改进领导力且在实习年度接触到持续质量改进活动的情况下,获得资格的护士能够保持其质量改进知识并继续参与质量改进。然而,缺乏质量改进机会以及一种不将质量改进视为新护士职责的文化被认为会阻碍参与。教育机构和实践伙伴需要仔细合作,以评估和开展持续的质量改进学习活动,支持新护士参与质量改进。

相似文献

1
Experiences of Newly Qualified Nurses' Engagement with Quality Improvement in Practice: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study.新获得资格护士在实践中参与质量改进的经历:一项定性随访研究。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(4):2990-3006. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040218.
2
'All we've ever known is Covid': A follow-up study with newly qualified nurses who worked as student nurses during the pandemic.“我们只知道新冠疫情”:一项针对在大流行期间担任实习护士的新注册护士的后续研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jan;33(1):381-392. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16591. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
3
A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators of quality improvement engagement by frontline nurses and leaders.一项关于一线护士和领导参与质量改进的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Apr;30(3):694-701. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13537. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
4
Introduction of a Registered Undergraduate Student of Nursing workforce: A qualitative study of student and registered nurses.引入注册护理本科生劳动力:一项对护生和注册护士的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Sep;80(9):3745-3756. doi: 10.1111/jan.16046. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
5
Quality improvement engagement and competence: A comparison between frontline nurses and nurse leaders.质量改进的参与和能力:一线护士与护理领导者之间的比较。
Nurs Outlook. 2021 Sep-Oct;69(5):836-847. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
Clinical placement education during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic shapes new nurses: A qualitative study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间的临床实习教育塑造新护士:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Jul 17;5:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100145. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Putting knowledge to work in clinical practice: Understanding experiences of preceptorship as outcomes of interconnected domains of learning.将知识付诸临床实践:理解指导经验作为学习相互关联领域的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):123-131. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13855. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
Original Research: Exploring Frontline Nurses' Self-Perceived Levels of QI Engagement and QI Competence.原始研究:探索一线护士的自我感知的质量改进参与度和质量改进能力。
Am J Nurs. 2023 Aug 1;123(8):22-33. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000947456.74501.f6.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Exploring newly qualified nurses' experiences of support and perceptions of peer support online: A qualitative study.探索新入职护士在线获得支持的体验和对同伴支持的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2924-2934. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15798. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to health professionals' engagement in quality improvement initiatives: a mixed-methods systematic review.卫生专业人员参与质量改进举措的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 May 21;36(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae041.
2
How, and under what contexts, do academic-practice partnerships collaborate to implement healthcare improvement education into preregistration nursing curriculums: a realist review protocol.学术-实践伙伴关系如何以及在何种背景下合作将医疗保健改进教育纳入护理课程的预注册课程:一个现实主义综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e077784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077784.
3
Role transition of newly graduated nurses from nursing students to registered nurses: A qualitative systematic review.新毕业护士从护生到注册护士的角色转变:一项质性系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105702. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105702. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Partnering with healthcare organisations to teach pre-registration health professions students about quality improvement: A systematic review.与医疗机构合作,教授预注册健康专业学生质量改进知识:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3219-3232. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16426. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
5
"Concrete ways we can make a difference": A multi-centre, multi-professional evaluation of sustainability in quality improvement education.“我们能够产生影响的具体方式”:质量改进教育中可持续性的多中心、多专业评估
Med Teach. 2022 Oct;44(10):1116-1124. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2064737. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Quality improvement engagement: Barriers and facilitators.质量改进参与:障碍与促进因素。
Nurs Manage. 2022 Mar 1;53(3):16-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000821708.46746.6f.
7
A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators of quality improvement engagement by frontline nurses and leaders.一项关于一线护士和领导参与质量改进的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Apr;30(3):694-701. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13537. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
8
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Sustainability in quality improvement (SusQI): a case-study in undergraduate medical education.质量改进中的可持续性(SusQI):本科医学教育中的案例研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02817-2.
10
Quality improvement engagement and competence: A comparison between frontline nurses and nurse leaders.质量改进的参与和能力:一线护士与护理领导者之间的比较。
Nurs Outlook. 2021 Sep-Oct;69(5):836-847. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 May 11.