• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国护士创新能力评价指标体系的构建:德尔菲研究

The construction of the index system for nurses' innovation competence evaluation in China: A Delphi study.

作者信息

Ma Li-Li, Zhang Ya-Juan, Rong Shan, Yao Jin-Xiu, Zhuang Hui-Ren, Zhang Wei-Ying

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200120, China.

Department of Nursing, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201103, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Oct 3;10(20):e38530. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38530. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38530
PMID:39449709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11497380/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scientific and technological innovation has become the "key variable" of national social and economic development. Nurses' innovation ability can improve the quality of patient care, thus shorten the hospital stay, reduce the medical costs, and promote the rapid development of the nursing industry. Nowadays nurses have gradually involved in various innovation, but less concerns are focus on the evaluation of nurse's innovation competence.

OBJECTIVE

To develop evaluation index system for nurse's innovation competence.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven experts with innovation experience from different regions in China.

METHODS

Literature review and qualitative interview were used to establish first version of index system. Then, a two-round Delphi expert consultation was conducted to collect opinions from 11 experts. Then the final version of nurses' innovation competence evaluation index was used in one tertiary hospital for preliminary application.

RESULTS

The response rate of the two rounds was more than 90%, the expert familiarity coefficient was 0.818, the judgment coefficient was 0.918, and the authority coefficient was 0.868. The two rounds of expert coordination coefficient test showed P < 0.05. The evaluation index system of nurses' innovation competence includes 4 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators. The scores of innovation production and innovation subject were the lowest among all the first-level indicators when use this index for preliminary application.

CONCLUSION

The constructed evaluation index system of nurses' innovation competence are scientific, reliable and practical, and can be used to promote nurse's innovation competence and innovation conversion competence in clinical practice. Hospital managers should pay more attention on cultivate nurse's innovation competence and provide resources and multi-form platforms to support the nurses with innovative ideas and willingness.

摘要

背景

科技创新已成为国家社会经济发展的“关键变量”。护士的创新能力可以提高患者护理质量,从而缩短住院时间,降低医疗成本,并促进护理行业的快速发展。如今,护士已逐渐参与到各种创新活动中,但对护士创新能力的评价关注较少。

目的

构建护士创新能力评价指标体系。

参与者

来自中国不同地区的11位具有创新经验的专家。

方法

采用文献回顾和质性访谈法建立指标体系的第一版。然后,进行两轮德尔菲专家咨询,收集11位专家的意见。最后,将护士创新能力评价指标的最终版本在一家三级医院进行初步应用。

结果

两轮的回复率均超过90%,专家熟悉系数为0.818,判断系数为0.918,权威系数为0.868。两轮专家协调系数检验显示P<0.05。护士创新能力评价指标体系包括4个一级指标、9个二级指标和36个三级指标。在初步应用该指标时,创新成果和创新主体的得分在所有一级指标中最低。

结论

构建的护士创新能力评价指标体系科学、可靠、实用,可用于促进护士在临床实践中的创新能力和创新转化能力。医院管理者应更加重视培养护士的创新能力,并提供资源和多种形式的平台,以支持有创新想法和意愿的护士。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c7/11497380/4487aff7f49f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c7/11497380/1aefd5774038/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c7/11497380/4487aff7f49f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c7/11497380/1aefd5774038/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c7/11497380/4487aff7f49f/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
The construction of the index system for nurses' innovation competence evaluation in China: A Delphi study.中国护士创新能力评价指标体系的构建:德尔菲研究
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 3;10(20):e38530. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38530. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
2
Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for infectious disease specialist nurse in China: a Delphi study.构建我国传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系:德尔菲法研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 10;21(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06402-2.
3
Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for sleep medicine nurse specialists in China: a Delphi study.构建中国睡眠医学专科护士核心能力评价指标体系:一项德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02349-2.
4
Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for otolaryngology nurse specialists in China: A Delphi study.构建中国耳鼻咽喉科护士专科核心能力评价指标体系的德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Dec;131:105956. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105956. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
Construction of a nurses' interpersonal communication knowledge system: A Delphi study.构建护士人际沟通知识体系:德尔菲研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105630. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105630. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Construction of a competency evaluation index system for front-line nurses during the outbreak of major infectious diseases: A Delphi study.重大传染病疫情期间一线护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建:德尔菲法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0270902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270902. eCollection 2022.
7
Construction of an evaluation index system of core competencies for critical care blood purification nurses in China: A Delphi study.中国重症护理血液净化护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103751. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
8
Development, reliability and validity of infectious disease specialist Nurse's Core competence scale.传染病专科护士核心能力量表的编制、信效度研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 17;20(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00757-2.
9
Construction of an index system for qualitative evaluation of undergraduate nursing students innovative ability: A Delphi study.构建本科护生创新能力定性评价指标体系的德尔菲法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4379-4388. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15020. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
Construction of nursing care quality evaluation indicators for post-anaesthesia care unit in China.中国麻醉后护理单元护理质量评价指标的构建
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):137-146. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16207. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Indicators of Age-Friendliness in Taiwanese Communities through a Modified Delphi Method.通过修正德尔菲法在台湾社区制定老龄化友好指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114430.
2
Construction of evidence-based practice competencies for nurses in China: A modified Delphi study.构建中国护士循证实践能力:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104927. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104927. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
3
Development of the competency assessment scale for clinical nursing teachers: Results of a Delphi study and validation.
临床护理教师能力评估量表的开发:德尔菲研究和验证结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jun;101:104876. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104876. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
A Delphi study to identify content for a new questionnaire based on the 10 Principles of Dignity in Care.基于关怀尊严的 10 项原则制定新问卷内容的德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1960-1971. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15462. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
An intervention including the national early warning score improves patient monitoring practice and reduces mortality: A cluster randomized controlled trial.一项包括国家早期预警评分的干预措施可改善患者监测实践并降低死亡率:一项集群随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1996-2005. doi: 10.1111/jan.14034. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
Innovative Behavior in Nursing Context: A Concept Analysis.护理情境中的创新行为:一项概念分析
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2018 Dec;12(4):237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.德尔菲研究在姑息治疗中的实施和报告指南(CREDES):基于方法学系统评价的建议。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684-706. doi: 10.1177/0269216317690685. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine.一项用于确定急诊医学绩效指标的德尔菲研究。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.001123.
9
An agenda for research into uterine artery embolization: results of an expert panel conference.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Apr;11(4):509-15. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61386-4.