Clinical usefulness of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm to ensure adequate vertical margins.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate endoscopic resection strategies for cT1b colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) ≤20 mm to determine strategies that enable adequate vertical margins (VMs).

METHODS

We enrolled 128 consecutive patients with cT1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm resected by endoscopic mucosal resection or hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Tumor lifting conditions after submucosal injection were classified into type A (lifting, soft dome-like), type B (lifting, hard trapezoid-like), and non-lifting (positive non-lifting sign). Predictors of positive VMs (VM 1) and adequate VMs were identified.

RESULTS

All non-lifting tumors were resected by hybrid ESD and VMs were ≥500 µm. Vertical margin 1 tumors were only found in the endoscopic mucosal resection group, in which, the proportion of type B tumors with VM 1 was significantly higher than that of tumors with negative VMs ( < 0.01). Type A tumors showed no significant between-group differences. Among type B tumors, the proportion of VMs ≥500 µm was significantly higher ( < 0.01) and the VM distance was significantly longer ( < 0.01) in the hybrid ESD group than in the endoscopic mucosal resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid ESD can be selected for type B tumors to ensure adequate VMs.