Thota Raghu S, Ramkiran S, Jayant Aveek, Kumar Koilada Shiv, Wajekar Anjana, Iyer Sadasivan, Ashwini M
Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre (Tata Memorial Hospital), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Onco-Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;68(10):861-874. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_405_24. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
The lack of a dedicated pain service catering to the postsurgical period has resulted in the origination of the pain-period gap. This has led to a resurgence of transitional pain service (TPS). Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of TPS in pain practice among postsurgical cancer patients and its prevention of persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), culminating in chronic pain catastrophising.
The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023407190). This systematic review included articles involving all adult cancer patients undergoing cancer-related surgery experiencing pain, involving pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interventional pain modalities after an initial systematic pain assessment by pain care providers across diverse clinical specialities, targeting multimodal integrative pain management. Meta-analysis with meta-regression was conducted to analyse the feasibility of TPS with individual subgroup analysis and its relation to pain-related patient outcomes.
Three hundred seventy-four articles were evaluated, of which 14 manuscripts were included in the meta-analysis. The lack of randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of TPS in preventing PPSP and pain catastrophising led to the analysis of its feasibility by meta-regression. The estimate among study variances τ was determined and carried out along with multivariate subgroup analysis. A regression coefficient was attained to establish the correlation between the feasibility of TPS and its patient outcome measures and opioid-sparing.
TPS interventions carried out by multidisciplinary teams incorporating bio-physical-psychological pain interventions have resulted in its successful implementation with improved pain-related patient outcomes mitigating the occurrence of PPSP.
缺乏专门针对术后阶段的疼痛服务导致了疼痛期差距的产生。这促使过渡性疼痛服务(TPS)再度兴起。我们的目标是评估TPS在术后癌症患者疼痛治疗中的可行性及其对持续性术后疼痛(PPSP)的预防作用,最终防止慢性疼痛灾难化。
本荟萃分析方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(注册号:CRD42023407190)登记。该系统评价纳入了所有接受癌症相关手术且经历疼痛的成年癌症患者的文章,这些文章涉及不同临床专科的疼痛护理人员在进行初步系统疼痛评估后采用的药物、非药物和介入性疼痛治疗方式,目标是多模式综合疼痛管理。进行了荟萃分析和荟萃回归,以通过个体亚组分析评估TPS的可行性及其与疼痛相关患者结局的关系。
共评估了374篇文章,其中14篇纳入荟萃分析。由于缺乏评估TPS预防PPSP和疼痛灾难化疗效的随机对照试验,故通过荟萃回归分析其可行性。确定了研究方差τ的估计值,并进行了多变量亚组分析。获得了一个回归系数,以建立TPS可行性与其患者结局指标及阿片类药物节省之间的相关性。
由多学科团队开展的包含生物 - 物理 - 心理疼痛干预的TPS已成功实施,改善了与疼痛相关的患者结局,减轻了PPSP的发生。