Saini Ruchi, Batra Puneet, Saini Nidhi, Punia Komal, Shair Tanjula, Raza Monis
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Subharti Dental College, Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
J Orthod Sci. 2024 Sep 17;13:29. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_208_23. eCollection 2024.
The present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare muscle activity after the treatment with rigid and flexible fixed functional appliance.
The study was conducted on 14 skeletal Class II malocclusion patients in the age group of 13-17 years, divided into two groups comprising 7 patients in each group. Group I was treated with a rigid fixed functional appliance (MPA IV), and Group II was treated with a flexible fixed functional appliance (Churro Jumper). Masseter and anterior temporalis muscle activities were recorded using needle electromyography (EMG) at postural rest, saliva swallowing, and clenching during five intervals (T to T) during fixed functional appliance treatment. Unpaired -test, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon sign rank test were applied for statistical analysis, and a value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Group I (MPA IV) showed a significant increase in EMG activity during postural rest position ( = 0.003, = 0.001), swallowing ( = 0.013, = 0.005), and clenching ( = 0.001, = 0.002) in masseter and anterior temporalis muscle, respectively. Group II (Churro jumper) also showed a significant increase in EMG activity during postural rest position ( = 0.000, = 0.000), swallowing ( = 0.001, = 0.000), and clenching ( = 0.001, = 0.000) in masseter and anterior temporalis muscle, respectively.
Both rigid (MPA IV) and flexible (Churro Jumper) fixed functional appliances caused a significant increase in EMG activity of masseter and anterior temporalis muscle during postural rest position, swallowing, and clenching in 6 months of the observation period, but the flexible appliance (Churro Jumper) showed more significant increase.
本研究旨在评估和比较使用刚性和柔性固定功能矫治器治疗后的肌肉活动情况。
本研究对14名年龄在13 - 17岁的骨骼型II类错牙合患者进行,分为两组,每组7名患者。第一组使用刚性固定功能矫治器(MPA IV)进行治疗,第二组使用柔性固定功能矫治器(Churro Jumper)进行治疗。在固定功能矫治器治疗期间的五个时间段(T到T)内,于姿势性休息、唾液吞咽和紧咬时,使用针电极肌电图(EMG)记录咬肌和颞肌前束的肌肉活动。采用独立样本t检验、曼 - 惠特尼U检验和威尔科克森符号秩检验进行统计分析,P值 <.05被认为具有统计学意义。
第一组(MPA IV)在姿势性休息位(P = 0.003,P = 0.001)、吞咽(P = 0.013,P = 0.005)和紧咬(P = 0.001,P = 0.002)时,咬肌和颞肌前束的EMG活动分别显著增加。第二组(Churro jumper)在姿势性休息位(P = 0.000,P = 0.000)、吞咽(P = 0.001,P = 0.000)和紧咬(P = 0.001,P = 0.000)时,咬肌和颞肌前束的EMG活动也分别显著增加。
在观察期的6个月内,刚性(MPA IV)和柔性(Churro Jumper)固定功能矫治器在姿势性休息位、吞咽和紧咬时均使咬肌和颞肌前束的EMG活动显著增加,但柔性矫治器(Churro Jumper)的增加更为显著。