Volk Sophia Charlotte
University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Sci Commun. 2024 Dec;46(6):758-789. doi: 10.1177/10755470241253858. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
Few studies have explored how science communication projects are evaluated and what impact they have. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the results of science communication projects carried out by academics. Drawing on the theory of change and evaluation models, possible results of science communication projects are conceptually distinguished at the levels of outputs, outcomes, and impacts. The study draws on a dataset of 128 science communication projects funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation from 2012 to 2022. Quantitative content analysis reveals few rigorous evaluation designs and a focus on reporting outputs, while outcomes and societal impacts are often neglected.
很少有研究探讨科学传播项目是如何被评估的以及它们产生了什么影响。本研究旨在通过分析学者开展的科学传播项目的结果来填补这一空白。借鉴变革理论和评估模型,在产出、成果和影响层面从概念上区分了科学传播项目可能产生的结果。该研究采用了瑞士国家科学基金会在2012年至2022年资助的128个科学传播项目的数据集。定量内容分析表明,严谨的评估设计很少,且侧重于报告产出,而成果和社会影响往往被忽视。