Piedimonte Alessandro, Volpino Valeria, Campaci Francesco, Borghesi Francesca, Guerra Giulia, Carlino Elisa
Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy.
Carlo Molo Foundation Onlus, Via della Rocca 24bis, 10123 Turin, Italy.
Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 17;14(5):2151-2165. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14050170.
Treatment choice during clinical practice is crucial to best help each patient. One of the physicians' main goals is choosing a personalized effective treatment, but it also represents a challenging issue. Here, we explored different treatment choices in a simulated patient-physician interaction.
Medical students ( = 48) and young Practicing Physicians ( = 20) were recruited to behave as "physicians" while fellow researchers acted as "patients". Participants were divided equally into a Belief Group, which received positive information about placebo efficacy, and a Non-Belief Group, which received negative information. Empathy traits and psychological variables were measured in both groups. During the task, participants were asked to choose between an active (TENS treatment) or a placebo treatment, to reduce patients' pain. Patients never underwent the painful stimulation but acted as if they had, simulating high or low pain responses to the placebo treatment (placebo-responders/placebo non-responders) and low pain to the TENS treatment.
Behavioral results showed that the Belief Group gave significantly more placebo treatments when faced with a patient that simulated placebo responsiveness, while the Non-Belief group showed a mirrorlike behavior, administrating more believed TENS treatments when faced with a placebo non-responder. No differences were found between Medical Students and Practicing Physicians.
This study constitutes a frame of reference for medical treatment decisions, indicating that physicians' treatment choices are influenced by patients' responsiveness to the treatments, as well as by their prior beliefs and empathy traits.
临床实践中的治疗选择对于为每位患者提供最佳帮助至关重要。医生的主要目标之一是选择个性化的有效治疗方法,但这也是一个具有挑战性的问题。在此,我们在模拟的医患互动中探索了不同的治疗选择。
招募了48名医学生和20名年轻执业医师扮演“医生”,同时其他研究人员扮演“患者”。参与者被平均分为信念组(该组收到关于安慰剂疗效的积极信息)和非信念组(该组收到消极信息)。对两组的共情特质和心理变量进行了测量。在任务过程中,要求参与者在主动治疗(经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗)或安慰剂治疗之间做出选择,以减轻患者的疼痛。患者从未接受过疼痛刺激,但表现得好像接受过一样,模拟对安慰剂治疗的高或低疼痛反应(安慰剂反应者/安慰剂无反应者)以及对经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗的低疼痛反应。
行为结果表明,当面对模拟安慰剂反应的患者时,信念组给予安慰剂治疗的比例显著更高,而非信念组则表现出类似的行为,当面对安慰剂无反应者时,给予更多他们认为有效的经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗。医学生和执业医师之间未发现差异。
本研究构成了医疗决策的参考框架,表明医生的治疗选择受患者对治疗的反应以及他们先前的信念和共情特质的影响。