Levi Ohad, Heled Eyal
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.
The Rehabilitation Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262160, Israel.
Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 30;16(5):1122-1131. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050084.
: Working memory (WM) involves temporarily storing and manipulating information. Research on the impact of aging on WM has shown inconsistent results regarding the decline in visual and verbal WM, with a lack of studies on tactile WM. This study aimed to assess the effects of aging on WM across verbal, visuospatial, and tactile modalities using span tasks of forward (storage) and backward (manipulation) stages. : A total of 130 participants, divided into four age groups of 20-29, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, completed the Digit, Visuospatial, and Tactual Spans. Performance was analyzed using a 3 (Task) × 4 (Group) × 2 (Stage) mixed design repeated measures ANOVA. : The analysis revealed significant main effects for modality ( < 0.001, η = 0.15), age ( < 0.001, η = 0.48), and stage ( < 0.001, η = 0.30). Digit Span outperformed the other modalities, while Tactual Span showed the worst performance. Additionally, task performance declined with age, and the forward stage was superior to the backward stage. Interaction effects indicated that Digit Span was less affected by aging compared to the Visuospatial and Tactual Spans ( = 0.004, η = 0.07). Post hoc analyses further revealed that the Digit Span consistently outperformed the other modalities in both stages, with more pronounced differences observed in the forward stage. : Verbal WM is more resilient to aging compared to the other modalities while tactile WM declines with age in a manner similar to verbal and visuospatial WM, suggesting a modality-specific impact of aging on WM.
工作记忆(WM)涉及对信息的临时存储和操作。关于衰老对工作记忆影响的研究表明,在视觉和言语工作记忆的衰退方面结果并不一致,而且缺乏对触觉工作记忆的研究。本研究旨在使用前向(存储)和后向(操作)阶段的广度任务,评估衰老对言语、视觉空间和触觉三种模式下工作记忆的影响。
共有130名参与者,分为20 - 29岁、60 - 69岁、70 - 79岁和80 - 89岁四个年龄组,完成了数字广度、视觉空间广度和触觉广度任务。使用3(任务)×4(组)×2(阶段)混合设计重复测量方差分析对表现进行分析。
分析显示,模式(<0.001,η = 0.15)、年龄(<0.001,η = 0.48)和阶段(<0.001,η = 0.30)的主效应显著。数字广度任务的表现优于其他模式,而触觉广度任务表现最差。此外,任务表现随年龄下降,前向阶段优于后向阶段。交互效应表明,与视觉空间广度和触觉广度相比,数字广度受衰老的影响较小(= 0.004,η = 0.07)。事后分析进一步表明,数字广度在两个阶段的表现均始终优于其他模式,在前向阶段观察到的差异更为明显。
与其他模式相比,言语工作记忆对衰老更具弹性,而触觉工作记忆随年龄下降的方式与言语和视觉空间工作记忆相似,这表明衰老对工作记忆具有模式特异性影响。