Raimundo Raquel, Cavaco Afonso
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
Departamento de Farmácia, Farmacologia e Tecnologias em Saúde, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Sep 24;12(5):143. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050143.
Ethical practice is a universal concern for healthcare professionals, independent of their social, cultural, or religious background. This study aimed to assess and categorise statements published in codes of ethics for pharmacists from three diverse societies within the wider European area. The study followed a qualitative exploratory and triangular design, comparing the leading professional and ethical statements between three geographically apart countries (Portugal, Lithuania, and Turkey) and using the International Pharmaceutical Federation Code of Ethics proposal as a gold standard. Common core values such as honesty, integrity, and professional autonomy were identified across the countries' codes, suggesting that shared recognised core values underpin pharmacists' practice and policies in culturally diverse settings. None of the codes fully correspond to the framework the International Pharmaceutical Federation proposed. The analysis elicited significant inconsistencies between the codes for analogous practice models within the same continent. Further studies are needed to gain a more profound and comprehensive understanding of the underlying reasons for these discrepancies so that ethical weaknesses can be improved and harmonisation towards best-practice principles can benefit patients and healthcare systems.
道德实践是医疗保健专业人员普遍关注的问题,与他们的社会、文化或宗教背景无关。本研究旨在评估和分类欧洲更广泛地区三个不同社会的药剂师道德准则中发表的声明。该研究采用定性探索性和三角设计,比较了三个地理位置不同的国家(葡萄牙、立陶宛和土耳其)之间的主要专业和道德声明,并将国际制药联合会道德准则提案作为黄金标准。各国的准则中都确定了诚实、正直和专业自主权等共同核心价值观,这表明在文化多元的环境中,共同认可的核心价值观支撑着药剂师的实践和政策。没有一个准则完全符合国际制药联合会提出的框架。分析揭示了同一大陆内类似实践模式的准则之间存在重大不一致。需要进一步研究,以更深入、全面地了解这些差异的根本原因,以便改进道德弱点,并朝着最佳实践原则进行协调,从而使患者和医疗保健系统受益。