School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
, Auckland, New Zealand.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Aug;42(4):1109-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01093-2. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
Background Complementary medicines are a popular healthcare choice among patients/consumers, and most pharmacies sell these products. Pharmacists are well-placed to advise on complementary medicines, but their training and practices for these products are not optimal. Pharmacists' professional practices for complementary medicines ought to be influenced by professional codes of ethics and standards. Objective To examine community pharmacists' perspectives on complementary medicines in New Zealand, including motivations and justifications for selling these products, and professional and ethical issues complementary medicines raise for pharmacists. Setting Community pharmacists in New Zealand. Method Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 27 New Zealand practising community pharmacists identified through purposive and convenience sampling. Main outcome measure Participants' views, experiences, and professional practices for complementary medicines. Results Participants struggled to clearly describe products they considered complementary medicines. Perspectives towards these products ranged from strongly supportive to somewhat sceptical; none was strongly opposed. Participants had several motivations for selling complementary medicines, particularly consumer demand and profits. Participants acknowledged ethical issues concerning complementary medicines, including lack of evidence of efficacy and pharmacists' limited training/knowledge. Few referred explicitly to complementary-medicines-related statements in the Pharmacy Council of New Zealand's Code of Ethics, or indicated these guided their practice. Conclusion Participants sold complementary medicines despite having limited knowledge on these products and concerns about efficacy; participants justified this as they believe they are providing an holistic option for patients, and/or ensuring complementary medicines do no harm. Participants were mindful of ethical/professional issues regarding complementary medicines, but were not necessarily aware of, or guided by, explicit statements in the Pharmacy Council of New Zealand's Code of Ethics.
背景 补充药物是患者/消费者选择的一种流行的医疗保健方法,大多数药店都销售这些产品。药剂师在补充药物方面有很好的建议,但他们对这些产品的培训和实践并不理想。药剂师对补充药物的专业实践应该受到职业道德准则和标准的影响。目的 调查新西兰社区药剂师对补充药物的看法,包括销售这些产品的动机和理由,以及补充药物对药剂师提出的专业和道德问题。地点 新西兰的社区药剂师。方法 通过目的性和便利性抽样,对 27 名新西兰执业社区药剂师进行了定性、半结构化访谈。主要结果措施 参与者对补充药物的看法、经验和专业实践。结果 参与者难以清楚地描述他们认为是补充药物的产品。对这些产品的看法从强烈支持到有些怀疑不等;没有强烈反对的。参与者有几个销售补充药物的动机,特别是消费者的需求和利润。参与者承认与补充药物相关的伦理问题,包括缺乏疗效证据和药剂师有限的培训/知识。很少有人明确提到新西兰药房理事会伦理准则中的补充药物相关声明,或者表示这些声明指导他们的实践。结论 尽管参与者对这些产品的知识有限,对疗效也存在担忧,但他们还是销售补充药物,认为他们为患者提供了一种整体的选择,或者确保补充药物不会造成伤害。参与者对补充药物的伦理/专业问题有一定的认识,但不一定了解或受到新西兰药房理事会伦理准则中明确声明的指导。