Ahluwalia Nikhil, Honarbakhsh Shohreh, Assadi Rangeena, Martin Samuel, Mohiddin Saidi, Elliott Perry M, Creta Antonio, Zeriouh Sarah, Boveda Serge, Baran Jakub, de Vere Felicity, Rinaldi Christopher A, Ding Wern Y, Gupta Dhiraj, El-Nayir Muram, Ginks Matthew, Ozturk Semi, Wong Tom, Procter Henry, Page Stephen P, Lambiase Pier, Hunter Ross J
St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; (Q)ueen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;10(12):2690-2700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is often highly symptomatic. The impact of catheter ablation (CA) may be under-reported when evaluated by long-term freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.
This study aims to evaluate whether CA of AF in patients with HCM would significantly reduce AF burden and improve symptoms.
A multicenter registry was established to enroll HCM patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing CA of AF between 2017 and 2021. The first AF recurrence and burden 12 months before and after CA were determined.
A total of 81 HCM patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent CA of AF. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1-year (35 [Q1-Q3: 23-50] months). AF was paroxysmal in 38 of 81 (46.9%) patients and burden pre-CA was 27.0% (Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 99.0%). A total of 35 (43.2%) patients had AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence within 12 months. AF burden reduced after CA to 0.5% (Q1-Q3 range: 0.0% to 11.1%) (P = 0.001); a 95% CI (13.8% to 100%) relative reduction. European Hearth Rhythm Association class improved by 1.8 ± 1.3 classes (P < 0.001). Of those with AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence, the reduction in AF burden was -33.7% (Q1-Q3: -88.9% to -13.8%) (P < 0.001) and 20 (57.1%) patients reported symptomatic improvement by ≥1 European Hearth Rhythm Association class. AF burden reduction was associated with symptomatic improvement. (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is common after CA in HCM patients, but this may under-represent the impact of CA in this cohort. CA significantly reduced AF burden and improved symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of AF burden, symptoms, and hard endpoints is needed to determine the utility of CA in this context.
心房颤动(AF)在肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者中更为常见,且通常症状严重。通过长期无任何房性心律失常来评估时,导管消融(CA)的影响可能未得到充分报道。
本研究旨在评估HCM患者的AF导管消融是否会显著减轻AF负担并改善症状。
建立了一个多中心注册研究,纳入2017年至2021年间接受AF导管消融且已植入心脏植入式电子设备的HCM患者。确定CA前后12个月的首次AF复发情况和负担。
共有81例植入心脏植入式电子设备的HCM患者接受了AF导管消融。患者随访至少1年(35 [第一四分位数-第三四分位数:23 - 50]个月)。81例患者中有38例(46.9%)的AF为阵发性,CA前的负担为27.0%(第一四分位数-第三四分位数:3.0%至99.0%)。共有35例(43.2%)患者在12个月内出现AF/房性心动过速复发。CA后AF负担降至0.5%(第一四分位数-第三四分位数范围:0.0%至11.1%)(P = 0.001);相对降低95%可信区间(13.8%至100%)。欧洲心律协会分级改善了1.8±1.3级(P < 0.001)。在出现AF/房性心动过速复发的患者中,AF负担降低了-33.7%(第一四分位数-第三四分位数:-88.9%至-13.8%)(P < 0.001),20例(57.1%)患者报告症状改善≥1级欧洲心律协会分级。AF负担减轻与症状改善相关(r = -0.67;P < 0.001)
HCM患者CA后AF复发很常见,但这可能低估了CA在该队列中的影响。CA显著减轻了AF负担并改善了症状。需要对AF负担、症状和硬终点进行综合评估,以确定CA在此情况下的效用。