Montz F J, Stanton S L
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;67(2):258-60. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198602000-00018.
The Q-Tip test, an inexpensive and widely used clinical investigative tool, was reevaluated as to diagnostic worth. One hundred patients were investigated with cystometergrams or videocystourethrography, and all patients underwent a standardized Q-Tip test. Thirty-two percent of patients with a positive Q-Tip test had either pure detrusor instability or pure sensory urgency as the diagnosis for urinary incontinence. Twenty-nine percent of patients who had a negative Q-Tip test had a diagnosis of pure genuine stress incontinence. The Q-Tip test was more likely to be positive in younger patients with a cystourethrocele who had undergone less bladder neck surgery. This study demonstrates the limitations of the Q-Tip test and reconfirms the need for more sensitive and specific urodynamic investigations of the incontinent woman.
棉签试验是一种廉价且广泛使用的临床检查工具,对其诊断价值进行了重新评估。对100例患者进行了膀胱测压或视频膀胱尿道造影检查,所有患者均接受了标准化的棉签试验。棉签试验阳性的患者中,32%的诊断为单纯逼尿肌不稳定或单纯感觉性尿急导致的尿失禁。棉签试验阴性的患者中,29%的诊断为单纯真性压力性尿失禁。棉签试验在膀胱尿道膨出且接受膀胱颈手术较少的年轻患者中更易呈阳性。本研究证明了棉签试验的局限性,并再次证实了对尿失禁女性进行更敏感、更特异的尿动力学检查的必要性。