Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Neurology, Hainan West Central Hospital, Danzhou, China.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108599. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108599. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
The treatment results of combination of arterial injection of tirofiban with endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) were inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ICAD-LVO treatment by intra-arterial injection of tirofiban combined with EVT.
Relevant studies were identified through a systematic literature search in Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, covering articles published from January 2010 to July 2024. The efficacy outcomes assessed in the meta-analysis included favorable functional outcome and recanalization rates. Safety outcomes included mortality and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH).
The meta-analysis consisted of data from 11 studies, which included 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 5 prospective cohort studies, and 5 retrospective cohort studies, encompassing a total of 2869 patients. The findings showed that tirofiban+EVT for ICAD-LVO was associated with significant improvements in favorable functional outcomes (RR, 1.12; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.21; P=0.005) and reductions in mortality rates (RR, 0.72; 95 %CI, 0.62-0.83; P<0.0001), despite no significant differences in the incidence of sICH (RR, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.55-1.02; P=0.07) and recanalization rates (RR, 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.99-1.05; P=0.15). Subgroup analysis showed that the application of tirofiban significantly increased favorable functional outcomes in patients with anterior circulation stroke (RR, 1.23; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.42; P=0.005), but there was no significant difference in posterior circulation stroke (RR, 1.08; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.41; P=0.55). In addition, the use of tirofiban in patients with posterior circulation stroke might reduce the incidence of sICH (RR, 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.26-0.96; P=0.04).
Tirofiban combined with EVT may be an effective treatment strategy for the treatment of ICAD-LVO, but only for patients with anterior circulation and remains unclear for patients with posterior circulation.
动脉内注射替罗非班联合血管内治疗(EVT)治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ICAD)所致急性大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的治疗效果存在不一致。本荟萃分析旨在评估动脉内注射替罗非班联合 EVT 治疗 ICAD-LVO 的安全性和有效性。
通过系统检索 Pubmed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,查找 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 7 月发表的相关研究。荟萃分析评估的疗效结局包括良好的功能结局和再通率。安全性结局包括死亡率和症状性颅内出血(sICH)。
荟萃分析纳入了 11 项研究的数据,包括 1 项随机对照试验(RCT)、5 项前瞻性队列研究和 5 项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 2869 例患者。结果显示,替罗非班联合 EVT 治疗 ICAD-LVO 可显著提高良好的功能结局(RR,1.12;95%CI,1.04-1.21;P=0.005)和降低死亡率(RR,0.72;95%CI,0.62-0.83;P<0.0001),但 sICH 发生率(RR,0.75;95%CI,0.55-1.02;P=0.07)和再通率(RR,1.02;95%CI,0.99-1.05;P=0.15)无显著差异。亚组分析显示,替罗非班的应用可显著提高前循环卒中患者的良好功能结局(RR,1.23;95%CI,1.06-1.42;P=0.005),但后循环卒中患者无显著差异(RR,1.08;95%CI,0.83-1.41;P=0.55)。此外,替罗非班在后循环卒中患者中的应用可能降低 sICH 发生率(RR,0.50;95%CI,0.26-0.96;P=0.04)。
替罗非班联合 EVT 可能是治疗 ICAD-LVO 的有效治疗策略,但仅适用于前循环患者,而后循环患者的情况仍不清楚。