Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛对通过一项新的侧别判断任务评估的内隐运动想象的影响。

Impact of chronic low back pain on implicit motor imagery assessed by a new laterality judgment task.

作者信息

Toussaint Lucette, Billot Maxime, Cabirol Rémi, Rigoard Philippe, Teillet Paul, David Romain, Tisserand Romain

机构信息

Université de Poitiers, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, CeRCA, UMR 7295, F-86000 Poitiers, France.

PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.

出版信息

J Pain. 2025 Jan;26:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104719. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Abstract

It is clear that implicit motor imagery (IMI) is impaired by chronic pain in peripheral regions (hand, feet), but unclear in axial regions (neck, shoulder, back). Previous IMI tasks displayed small-amplitude movements of axial regions, which limits person-centered IMI processes mobilization. This study aimed to assess the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on IMI processes with a new task displaying large-amplitude whole-body movements mobilizing the lumbar spine. Twenty patients with CLBP and twenty age-matched controls performed a laterality judgment task on four distinct whole-body movements (trunk flexion, trunk rotation, capoeira, kickboxing). Participants viewed images from four different body viewpoints (back, left, right and front), randomly presented. Mixed ANOVAs were used to compare judgment accuracy and response times between groups and conditions. In participants with CLBP, response times were longer than in controls. The response times of participants with CLBP were also associated with DN4 scores, a self-reported questionnaire assessing neuropathic pain. We validated the use of a person-centered IMI because, for all participants, the accuracy decreased and the response times increased for images presented in the front viewpoint, i.e. when a 180° turn in IMI was required, compared to other viewpoints. The laterality judgment task proposed here confirmed that CLBP impacts IMI processes, and that the nature of pain (neuropathic or mechanical) needs to be considered because it seems to modulate IMI processes. PERSPECTIVE: A laterality judgment task with large-amplitude lumbar movements is key to show that CLBP alters processing speed of sensorimotor information originating from the painful region. This task could become an objective tool, transferable in clinical settings, for assessing the impact and the progression of CLBP on motor control processes.

摘要

显然,外周区域(手、脚)的慢性疼痛会损害内隐运动想象(IMI),但轴向区域(颈部、肩部、背部)的情况尚不清楚。以往的IMI任务展示的是轴向区域的小幅度运动,这限制了以个体为中心的IMI过程的调动。本研究旨在通过一项展示大幅度全身运动以调动腰椎的新任务,评估慢性腰痛(CLBP)对IMI过程的影响。20名CLBP患者和20名年龄匹配的对照组人员对四种不同的全身运动(躯干前屈、躯干旋转、卡波耶拉舞、跆拳道)进行了方向判断任务。参与者从四个不同的身体视角(背部、左侧、右侧和正面)观看图像,图像随机呈现。采用混合方差分析来比较组间和不同条件下的判断准确性和反应时间。在CLBP患者中,反应时间比对照组更长。CLBP患者的反应时间也与DN4评分相关,DN4评分是一份评估神经性疼痛的自我报告问卷。我们验证了以个体为中心的IMI的应用,因为对于所有参与者来说,与其他视角相比,当呈现正面视角的图像时,即当IMI中需要进行180°转身时,准确性下降且反应时间增加。这里提出的方向判断任务证实了CLBP会影响IMI过程,并且需要考虑疼痛的性质(神经性或机械性),因为它似乎会调节IMI过程。观点:一项具有大幅度腰椎运动的方向判断任务是关键,它表明CLBP会改变源自疼痛区域的感觉运动信息的处理速度。这项任务可以成为一种客观工具,可在临床环境中应用,用于评估CLBP对运动控制过程的影响和进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验