• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良下颌下缘截骨术能否改善双侧矢状劈开截骨术的手术效果?

Does the modified inferior border osteotomy improve the surgical outcomes in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?

作者信息

Topan Cihan, Bilge Suheyb, Demirbas Ahmet Emin

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Sep;126(4):102122. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122
PMID:39454872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of lower border osteotomy on the lingual split pattern and IAN in BSSO procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised 32 patients (64 operated sides) who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) due to dentofacial abnormalities between the periods of April 2021 and April 2022. In the mandible, 32 sides (the conventional group) received standard BSSO surgery, while 32 sides (the modified group) additionally received lower border osteotomy. Data regarding the split difficulty of the mandibular in BSSO surgery and the recovery status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) one year after surgery were obtained and evaluated from patient records. The fracture line was radiographically evaluated for the lingual split pattern following surgery.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was observed in favor of the modified group when the mandibular split difficulty of the groups was compared (p = 0.032). The split time of the modified group was found to be statistically shorter than the conventional group (p ≤ 0.001). The mean numbness level of the modified group one year after surgery was statistically significantly lower than that of the conventional group (p = 0.019). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of lingual fracture pattern, the rate of type 1 (87.5 %) fracture was higher in the modified group compared to the other group (68.8 %) (p = 0.089).

CONCLUSION

The lower border osteotomy performed in addition to the conventional BSSO surgery allows the split procedure easier and in a shorter time. The modification resulted in an increased incidence of type 1 lingual fracture pattern in the mandible. The neurosensory recovery capacity of the IAN in the postoperative period is higher in areas where lower-border osteotomies are performed.

摘要

背景

探讨下颌下缘截骨术对双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)中舌侧劈开模式及下牙槽神经(IAN)的影响。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2021年4月至2022年4月期间因牙颌面畸形接受双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)的32例患者(64侧手术侧)。在下颌骨,32侧(传统组)接受标准BSSO手术,而32侧(改良组)额外接受下颌下缘截骨术。从患者记录中获取并评估BSSO手术中下颌劈开难度及术后一年下牙槽神经(IAN)的恢复情况的数据。术后通过影像学评估骨折线的舌侧劈开模式。

结果

比较两组的下颌劈开难度时,观察到改良组具有统计学显著差异(p = 0.032)。发现改良组的劈开时间在统计学上短于传统组(p≤0.001)。改良组术后一年的平均麻木程度在统计学上显著低于传统组(p = 0.019)。尽管两组在舌侧骨折模式方面无统计学显著差异,但改良组1型骨折发生率(87.5%)高于另一组(68.8%)(p = 0.089)。

结论

在传统BSSO手术基础上进行下颌下缘截骨术可使劈开操作更容易且时间更短。这种改良导致下颌骨1型舌侧骨折模式的发生率增加。在下颌下缘截骨的区域,术后IAN的神经感觉恢复能力更高。

相似文献

1
Does the modified inferior border osteotomy improve the surgical outcomes in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?改良下颌下缘截骨术能否改善双侧矢状劈开截骨术的手术效果?
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Sep;126(4):102122. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术与口内垂直下颌支截骨术用于下颌后缩时,在稳定性或神经感觉功能方面是否存在差异?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1360-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
Impact of different lingual split patterns on inferior alveolar nerve recovery after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.不同舌侧劈开模式对Ⅲ类骨性错牙合患者双侧矢状劈开截骨术后下牙槽神经恢复的影响
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Aug;53(8):1135-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.03.021. Epub 2025 May 5.
4
Is lingual fracture pattern in sagittal split osteotomy associated with recovery of neurosensory disturbance?矢状劈开截骨术中的舌侧骨折模式与神经感觉障碍的恢复有关吗?
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):e590-e596. doi: 10.4317/medoral.27136.
5
Influence of different lingual split patterns on skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.不同舌侧劈开模式对Ⅲ类骨性错牙合患者双侧矢状劈开截骨术后骨骼稳定性的影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Sep;53(9):1365-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.006. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
6
Advancing precision in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a pioneering perspective on minimizing inferior alveolar nerve injury through endoscopic visualization.双侧矢状劈开截骨术的精准度提升:通过内镜可视化将下牙槽神经损伤降至最低的开创性观点。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jul 7;29(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01428-1.
7
Unveiling the link between impacted third molars and bad split risk in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A 12-year retrospective study.揭示下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中阻生第三磨牙与不良劈开风险之间的联系:一项为期12年的回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Sep;53(9):1538-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.06.004. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
8
Do lower third molars increase the risk of complications during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy? Systematic review and meta-analysis.下颌骨矢状劈开截骨术中低位第三磨牙是否增加并发症风险?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jul;51(7):906-921. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of reported risk factors.双侧矢状劈开截骨术中的不良劈开:已报道危险因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;45(8):971-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
10
Anatomical factors associated with the lingual fracture pattern in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A case-control study.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中与舌侧骨折模式相关的解剖学因素:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329542. eCollection 2025.